Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of measures of comorbidity for predicting disability 12-months post-injury

  • Belinda J Gabbe1, 2, 4Email author,
  • James E Harrison3,
  • Ronan A Lyons4,
  • Elton R Edwards1, 5, 6,
  • Peter A Cameron1, 2, 6 and
  • On behalf of the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry
BMC Health Services Research201313:30

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-30

Received: 8 June 2012

Accepted: 23 January 2013

Published: 26 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Van der Meulen
23 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Areti Tillou
3 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Belinda Gabbe
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
26 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre
National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital
Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University
College of Medicine, Swansea University
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Alfred
Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital