Socioeconomic differences in mortality amenable to health care among Finnish adults 1992-2003: 12 year follow up using individual level linked population register data
© McCallum et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 11 May 2012
Accepted: 23 November 2012
Published: 3 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Katherine McCallum|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjørn Heine Strand|
|5 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Tobias|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Katherine McCallum|
|7 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjørn Heine Strand|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.