Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Use of surgical task shifting to scale up essential surgical services: a feasibility analysis at facility level in Uganda

  • Moses Galukande1Email author,
  • Sam Kaggwa1,
  • Patrick Sekimpi2,
  • Othman Kakaire3,
  • Achilles Katamba4,
  • Ian Munabi5,
  • Francis Mwesigye Runumi6,
  • Ed Mills7,
  • Amy Hagopian8,
  • Geoffrey Blair9,
  • Scott Barnhart8 and
  • Sam Luboga5
BMC Health Services Research201313:292

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-292

Received: 29 December 2012

Accepted: 31 July 2013

Published: 1 August 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
25 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Torsten Wilhelm
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
12 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
20 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 10
20 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
9 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
10 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Torsten Wilhelm
8 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Moses Galukande
Resubmission - Version 12
8 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
31 Jul 2013 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-292

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University
(2)
Department of Orthopaedics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University
(3)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University
(4)
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University
(5)
Department of Anatomy, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University
(6)
Ministry of Health
(7)
University of Washington
(8)
University of British Columbia
(9)
University of Ottawa

Advertisement