Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors affecting hospital length of stay and hospital charges associated with road traffic-related injuries in Iran

  • Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli1, 2, 3,
  • Soheil Saadat4Email author,
  • Lennart Bogg1, 5,
  • Mohammad Hossein Yarmohammadian3 and
  • Marie Hasselberg1
BMC Health Services Research201313:281

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-281

Received: 20 September 2011

Accepted: 11 July 2013

Published: 22 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a substantial cause of mortality and disability globally. There is little published information regarding healthcare resource utilization following RTIs, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study was to assess total hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) associated with RTIs in Iran and to explore the association with patients’ socio-demographic characteristics, insurance status and injury-related factors (e.g. type of road users and safety equipment).

Method

The study was based on the Iranian National Trauma Registry Database (INTRD), which includes data from 14 general hospitals in eight major cities in Iran, for the years 2000 to 2004. 8,356 patients with RTI admitted to the hospitals were included in the current study. The variables extracted for the analysis included total hospital charges and length of stay, age, gender, socio-economic and insurance status, injury characteristics, medical outcome and use of safety equipment among the patients. Univariable analysis using non-parametric methods and multivariable regression analysis were performed to identify the factors associated with total hospital charges and LOS.

Results

The mean hospital charges for the patients were 1,115,819 IRR (SD=1,831,647 IRR, US$128 ± US$210). The mean LOS for the patients was 6.8 (SD =8 days). Older age, being a bicycle rider, higher injury severity and longer LOS were associated with higher hospital charges. Longer LOS was associated with being male, having lower education level, having a medical insurance, being pedestrian or motorcyclist, being a blue-collar worker and having more severe injuries. The reported use of safety equipment was very low and did not have significant effect on the hospital charges and LOS.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the hospital charges and LOS associated with RTI varied by age, gender, socio-economic status, insurance status, injury characteristics and health outcomes of the patients. The results of the study provide information that can be of importance in the planning and design of road traffic injury control strategies.

Background

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate number occurring in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. Apart from the human suffering, RTIs are also responsible for economic losses of approximately 1–1.5% of the annual gross national product (GNP) in LMICs [1].

Iran has one of the highest RTI death rates in the world [2, 3]. RTIs are considered to be the second cause of mortality in the country, after cardiovascular diseases [2]. RTIs pose a significant burden on the health care sector as almost 0.8 million people (1.1% of population) seek hospital care as a result of RTI annually [2]. Moreover, since traffic-related mortality and morbidity in Iran occur most commonly among young adults, the impact of RTIs (permanent disability and premature death) is huge both in terms of human suffering and economic consequences for families and for the society [2, 4]. RTIs constitute the leading burden of disease in the country, with the highest number of Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) accrued for the population [2, 4]. The annual cost of road traffic crashes in Iran is estimated to be approximately US$ 2 billion (about 2% of GNP) [4, 5].

The costs and resource burden of traumas have been documented in high-income countries (HICs) [610], but few studies have been published from LMICs [11, 12], particularly in relation to RTIs. In Iran, where information on the outcomes of RTI has been well documented in previous studies [1315], there is little data reported on trauma care costs and resource utilization of RTIs. In particular, there are no published analyses of factors affecting resource utilization by RTI victims. Such information is valuable for policy makers in Iran and in other LMICs with similar context in order to prioritize injury prevention and trauma care interventions.

Previous studies in HICs, have identified factors such as age, gender, injury severity, hospital mortality, insurance type and hospital location as predictors of hospital charges and length of stay for injuries [610]. Studies have also shown that the use of safety equipment (helmet and seat-belt) improves medical outcomes and reduces health care resource utilization [1619].

The current study aimed to assess hospital charges and LOS associated with RTIs in Iran and to explore the relationship with socio-demographic characteristics, insurance status and injury-related factors (e.g. type of road users and safety equipment) of the patients.

Method

Setting

Iran, a low-middle income country, is located in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and covers 1,648,000 sq km [20]. The country has over 70 million inhabitants, of whom 69% live in urban areas [21]. Vehicle ownership is significantly higher in Iran than in other countries with similar income levels [2]. Based on estimates from the 2006 Census, Iran had almost six million cars and over five million motorized two-wheeler vehicles [2]. With the growing pattern of urbanization and motorization during the past few years, there has been a rapid increase in traffic-related injury mortality and morbidity [3]. The RTI rate nearly quadrupled in just eight years, from 109.7 to 400.6 per 100 000 population between 1997 and 2005 [3]. Such rapid increase in RTIs has imposed great pressures on the health sector, insurance companies and patients and their families [4]. At the time of conducting this study, medical charges of RTI victims were covered for those with medical insurance of any kind (except for pre-hospital care provided by Emergency Medical Service or EMS, which was free of charge for all patients). The four major public insurance systems in Iran are; a) The Medical Service Insurance Organization; provides coverage for around 40% of population mainly government employees, rural households, the self-employed, and others such as students. It is largely financed through general tax revenues. b) The Social Security Organization; provides a range of benefits such as pensions, unemployment benefit, disability benefit and health insurance for around 30% of population, mainly workers in the non-governmental sector including self-employed and voluntary contributors, and contractual workers from the public sector. It is funded by a payroll tax shared by employer and employee and provides health services to its members either directly through its own hospitals and health centres or indirectly via contracts with other providers. c) The Armed Forces Medical Services Organization; covers about 5% of population included the members of the army, police and other armed forces and their dependents. It provides services mostly through contracting directly through its own facilities or via contracts with other providers. d) The Imam Khomeini Relief Committee; covers around 8% of population who cannot afford to pay for insurance. It is financed by charity and the government and provides services through contracts with different providers [2225]. In addition there are other small semi-public companies which mainly provide complementary insurance policies, covering almost 5% of the middle-class population [23]. According to a newly approved law, which came into force in 2008, all hospital care for RTI victims is now free of charge [26]. The new law was implemented after our data was collected.

Data source and variables

This study utilized the Iranian National Trauma Registry Database (INTRD). The database includes data from 14 general hospitals affiliated to the Medical Universities in eight major cities in Iran (Tehran, for 13 months; Mashhad and Ahwaz for 7 months; and Shiraz, Tabriz, Qom, Kermanshah, and Babul for 4 months). The data was collected between 2000 and 2004 by trained physicians using a validated questionnaire, in accordance with the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Registry System and the National Trauma Data Bank. During the data collection period, a group of trained physicians visited trauma patients after the first 24-hours of their admission to the hospital (at emergency department or inpatient wards) and completed the questionnaires (i.e.: the database does not cover out-patients).

A total of 17,753 trauma patients were recruited, among them 8,356 patients with road traffic-related injuries. These patients were included in the current study. The data gathered included socio-demographic characteristics of the patients (including age, sex, occupation and education), pre-hospital care (including transportation type and duration and care provided), type and mechanism of injury, coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) a , Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and vital signs at the time of entering the emergency department, Injury Severity Score (ISS), diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, co-existing injuries, length of stay (LOS) in hospital and intensive care unit, patient’s outcome (including discharge with recovery, death, short-term or long-term disabilities), total hospital charges for each patient and insurance type. Information such as socio-demographic, using safety equipment, insurance type were collected through interview with patients (or persons accompanying patients in case if the patient was too ill to report this information) and diagnostic information, LOS and the hospital charges (Iranian Rial-IRR) obtained from the patient’s medical and accounting records.

INTRD have mainly been used in epidemiological studies on various types of trauma [2729]. This is the first study using this database to investigate total hospital charges and LOS related to RTIs and factors associated with them. Total hospital charges and LOS have been used, as measures for resource utilization, by previous trauma studies [6, 7, 30, 31]. Total hospital charges are the amount billed by the hospitals for the services and do not reflect the actual medical costs for the injury, because of the governmental subsidies for hospital services and medicines and also discounts and exemptions for some patients given by the hospitals. The bill is issued before the patient discharge and comprises costs of all services the patient received (included items such as, hostel costs, diagnostic services, medicines, consultation fees, surgery,…) and included both patient and insurance company shares (if insured) of payments. Hospital charges were adjusted for inflation and converted to 2004 IRR using the consumer price index for health care in Iran from 2000 to 2004.

Moreover, the following information was extracted from the database: 1) socio-demographic status of patients; including age, sex, education, occupation and insurance status, 2) type of road users including pedestrians, car passengers or drivers, motorcycle riders, bicycle riders and others, 3) injury severity measures including GCS and ISS, 4) patient outcome measured by death in hospital and 5) use of safety equipment including helmet and seat-belt.

Data analysis

Initially, the mean and median LOS and total hospital charges were compared in sub-categories of patients’ demographic and injury characteristics by using Mann Whitney U test (for dichotomous variables such as sex and insurance status) and Kruskal-Wallis test (for categorical variables such as education level, ISS, GCS, road user types, age group and occupation). Chi-Square and Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare the proportion of (in hospital) deaths and mean and median total hospital charges/LOS, respectively, among people who used safety equipment (helmet/seat-belt) and those who did not use safety equipment. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Furthermore, multivariable regression analyses of hospital charges and LOS were conducted in order to identify the key predictors. Due to the skewed distribution of total hospital charges and LOS (outcome variables), they were log transformed. Multivariable regression was conducted separately for total hospital charges and LOS as dependent variables and age, sex, education, occupation, insurance status, ISS, GCS, road user types and death in hospital (and LOS for the model in which hospital charges was considered as dependent variable) as independent variables. A full model including all independent variables was initially estimated and then using a backward stepwise selection procedure, a final model including only those variables that had a statistically significant association with hospital charges or LOS was developed. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 13.0).

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center (STSRC). Informed consent was provided from all patients before they were enrolled in the study.

Results

Socio-demographics and injury characteristics of the study population

RTIs comprised nearly 50% (8,356 cases) of all traumatic patients admitted to the studied hospitals. The results showed that 78% of the patients were male (male–female ratio, 3.4) and the mean age was 30.75±18.1 (median, 26). The age group 15 to 29 years had most RTIs (41%) and most patients (50%) had elementary and intermediate education followed by those who were illiterate (22%). The majority, 59% of the patients, reported that they did not have any type of insurance (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic and injury characteristics of RTI victims included in INTRD, 2000-2004

Characteristics

N (%)

Characteristics

N (%)

Sex:

 

Died in hospital:

 

Male

6479 (77.5)

Yes

402 (4.9)

Female

1876 (22.4)

No

7844 (95.1)

Age:

 

Road user type:

 

0–4

178 (2.1)

Pedestrian

3422 (41)

5–14

1126 (13.5)

Car occupant

1639 (19.7)

15–29

3462 (41.4)

Motorcyclist

2847 (34.1)

30–44

1747 (20.9)

Bicycle rider

316 (3.8)

45–59

913 (10.9)

Others

132 (1.6)

60+

897 (10.7)

Transportation mode:

 

Education level:

 

EMS ambulances

1049 (12.7)

Illiterate

1770 (21.5)

Other ambulances

1972 (23.7)

Elementary/Intermediate

4085 (49.6)

Other vehicles

5272 (63.4)

  

Unspecified

20 (0.24)

High school

2001 (24.3)

ISS

 

University

373 (4.3)

1–7

4004 (52.9)

Occupation type:

 

8–12

2105 (27.8)

Retired

230 (2.8)

13+

1457 (19.3)

Armed forces

184 (2.2)

GCS

 

White-collar worker

942 (11.3)

3–8

521 (6.2)

Blue-collar worker

2192 (26.3)

9–12

444 (5.3)

Farmer

399 (4.8)

13–15

7386 (88.4)

Others*

4255 (51.1)

Safety helmet use:

 

Unspecified

127 (1.5)

Yes

152 (5.4)

Insurance status:

 

No

2678 (94.6)

Yes

3216 (41.1)

Seat belt use:

 

No

4601 (58.9)

Yes

87 (5.4)

  

No

1533 (94.6)

RTI: Road traffic injury, INTRD: Iranian National Trauma Registry Database,

ISS: Injury Severity Score, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale,

*Children younger than school age, students, unemployed persons, etc.

Most of the victims were pedestrians (41%). Only 5% of the car occupants had used seat-belts and the same low usage was shown for safety helmets. Five percent of the victims died in hospital. Moreover, the data showed that as many as 63% of the patients were transported to the hospital by means of transportation other than ambulance, and only 13% were transported by EMS ambulances (Table 1). The average duration of transportation to hospital by an EMS ambulance, another ambulance or by other means were 2:46 (median 1:15), 6:31 (median 3:56) and 3:40 (median 1:00) hours, respectively.

Majority of the patients (53%) had an ISS of 1–7 and GCS of 88% of patients was 13–15 in the emergency department. The mean (median) ISS and GCS scores were 10 (5) and 14 (15), respectively (Table 2). Males had higher ISS than females. Mean ISS was higher among car occupants and pedestrians followed by other road users and motorcycle riders.
Table 2

Total hospital charges, and LOS for RTI victims included in INTRD, 2000-2004

Characteristics

 

Total hospital charges (IRR)

 

Mean

1,115,819

SD

1,831,647

Median

558,680

Total range

0-46,131,061*

LOS

 

Mean

6.8

SD

8

Median

4

Total range

1-105

ISS

 

Mean

9.7

SD

12

Median

5

Total range

1-75

GCS

 

Mean

14

SD

2.6

Median

15

Total range

3-15

RTI: Road traffic injury, INTRD: Iranian National Trauma Registry.

Database, LOS: length of stay, ISS: Injury Severity Score,

GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, IRR: Iranian Rials.

(One US Dollar in 2004 was on average equal to 8,719 IRR),

* Patients with 0 charges (74 patients) are patients that their charges.

Were waived by the hospitals by different reasons. These patients.

Were excluded from the univariable and multivariable models.

Total hospital charges and LOS

The mean total hospital charges for the patients were 1,115,819 IRR (SD=1,831,647 IRR, US$128± US$210). It ranged from 0 to 46,131,061 IRR (US$ 0- US$ 5,291). The mean LOS for the patients was 6.8 days (SD=8 days). LOS ranged from 1 day to 105 days, with a median of 5 days (Table 2).

Table 3 presents mean and median total hospital charges and LOS according to socio-demographic and injury characteristics of patients. Male patients had longer LOS (P=0.016) and higher hospitalization charges compared to women (P=0.010). Patients with a higher level of education had shorter LOS (P<0.001) and lower hospital charges (P<0.001) compared to those with lower education levels. There were no significant differences in LOS and hospital charges between different age groups. Patients with insurance stayed longer (P<0.001) and were charged more per hospitalization (P<0.001) compared to patients without any type of insurance. LOS and total hospital charges differed according to the occupation of the patients (P<0.001 for both LOS and total charges). Blue-collar and farmers had longer LOS compare with other occupational groups and retired had higher hospital charges than other groups. The differences in LOS and hospital charges for different road users were significant (P<0.001 for both LOS and total charges). Bicycle riders had the shortest LOS and the lowest hospital charges compared to other road users. There were significant differences in LOS and hospital charges between different ISS and GCS levels (P<0.001 for both LOS and total charges), indicating, as would be expected, that LOS and hospital charges increased by increasing injury severity. Patients who died in hospital had shorter LOS (P<0.001) and higher total hospital charges (P<0.001) than patients who survived.
Table 3

Mean and median total hospital charges and length of stay (LOS) based on socio-demographic and injury characteristics of road traffic victims included in the INTRD, 2000–2004

Characteristics

LOS

Total hospital charges (IRR)

Mean

Median

Mean

Median

Sex *

Female

6.0

5.0

966,029

440,255

 

Male

6.6

5.0

1,159,487

600,625

Age

<= 4

6.1

3.0

788,973

374,320

 

5 - 14

6.4

5.0

933,505

467,540

 

15 - 29

6.4

5.0

1,130,350

612,229

 

30 - 44

6.6

5.0

1,152,872

551,460

 

45 - 59

6.3

5.0

1,086,289

535,779

 

60+

6.8

5.0

1,336,937

641,535

Occupation *

Retired

6.3

5.0

1,511,020

540,710

 

Armed forces

6.0

5.0

1,098,797

515,349

 

White-collar worker

6.1

5.0

1,083,475

499,654

 

Blue-collar worker

7.2

5.0

1,256,809

792,742

 

Farmer

7.5

7.0

1,299,259

704,607

 

Others

6.3

5.0

1,020,330

486,000

Medical insurance*

No

6.0

5.0

1,057,233

484,902

 

Yes

7.0

5.0

1,168,149

654,635

Road user type*

Pedestrian

6.6

5.0

1,127,656

523,191

 

Car occupant

6.1

5.0

1,036,314

466,085

 

Motorcyclist

6.6

5.0

1,174,484

684,590

 

Bicycle rider

5.4

5.0

837,929

434,853

 

Others

7.2

5.0

1,177,953

654,091

ISS*

1-7

5.6

3.0

788,122

383,042

 

8-12

8.0

7.0

1,487,664

1,022,613

 

13+

7.2

5.0

1,635,498

831,546

GCS*

3-8

6.3

3.0

2,226,453

812,361

 

9-12

8.1

7.0

1,647,298

911,787

 

13-15

6.4

5.0

1,020,593

534,538

Died in hospital*

No

6.6

5.0

1,098,766

565,068

 

Yes

3.8

1.0

1,464,993

274,938

Use of seat belt*†

No

6.0

5.0

1,012,010

455,587

 

Yes

6.1

5.0

883,428

728,085

Use of helmet

No

6.7

5.0

1,182,108

686,574

 

Yes

5.8

5.0

944,666

585,733

INTRD: Iranian National Trauma Registry Database, ISS: Injury Severity Score, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.

* Significant at P<0.05.

† Only significant for total hospital charges.

Multivariable analysis of total hospital charges (Table 4) showed that being at older age, having higher ISS or lower GCS, being a bicycle rider and longer LOS were associated with higher hospital charges. At the same time, being pedestrian or being car occupant, compared with bicycle riders, was associated with lower hospital charges.
Table 4

Multivariable analysis of total hospital charges for RTI victims included in INTRD, 2000-2004

Total charges*

β

P

95% CI

β

P

95% CI

 

LOS

0.08

0.00

0.078

0.082

0.081

0.00

0.079

0.083

Sex

Female

2.85

1.00

−0.03

0.03

    

Male**

0

       

Age groups

<= 4

−0.115

0.00

−0.19

−0.04

−0.113

0.00

−0.184

−0.042

7-14

−0.093

0.00

−0.143

−0.044

−0.082

0.00

−0.123

−0.042

15 - 29

−0.007

0.77

−0.053

0.04

−0.012

0.51

−0.047

0.023

30 - 44

−0.046

0.06

−0.093

0.001

−0.041

0.03

−0.078

−0.003

45 - 59

−0.026

0.28

−0.074

0.022

−0.021

0.33

−0.064

0.021

60+**

0

   

0

   

Education

Illiterate

0.066

0.03

0.007

0.126

    

Elementary/Intermediate

0.088

0.00

0.035

0.141

    

High school

0.05

0.07

−0.003

0.102

    

University**

0

       

Occupation

Retired

−0.023

0.51

−0.092

0.045

    

Armed forces

−0.018

0.62

−0.088

0.052

    

White collar worker

−0.008

0.67

−0.047

0.03

    

Blue collar worker

0.021

0.21

−0.012

0.054

    

Farmer

0.022

0.50

−0.042

0.087

    

Others**

0

       

Road user type†

Pedestrian

−0.077

0.01

−0.135

−0.02

−0.077

0.01

−0.131

−0.022

Car occupant

−0.07

0.02

−0.131

−0.009

−0.076

0.01

−0.133

−0.019

Motorcyclist

−0.039

0.20

−0.098

0.02

−0.038

0.19

−0.094

0.018

Bicycle rider**

0

   

0

   

Medical insurance

No

0.018

0.09

−0.003

0.04

    

Yes**

0

       

ISS

1-7

−0.14

0.00

−0.173

−0.107

−0.134

0.00

−0.165

−0.104

8-12

0.021

0.24

−0.014

0.056

0.017

0.31

−0.015

0.049

13+ **

0

   

0

   

GCS

3-8

0.117

0.00

0.048

0.185

0.059

0.02

0.01

0.108

9-12

0.098

0.00

0.045

0.15

0.07

0.00

0.022

0.118

13-15**

0

   

0

   

Died in hospital

No

0.063

0.10

−0.012

0.137

    

Yes**

0

       

RTI: Road traffic injury, INTRD: Iranian National Trauma Registry Database, LOS: length of stay, ISS: Injury Severity Score, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.

*Model fitting information (final model): Deviance/chi-Square = 1196.88 (with d.f. of 6978 and P = 0.172).

**Reference group.

†The group “others” in road user type were not included in the analysis.

Multivariable analysis of LOS (Table 5) showed that being male, having lower education level, having a medical insurance, being a blue-collar, being pedestrian or motorcyclist, having higher ISS score or having lower GCS score were associated with longer LOS. In-hospital death and being retired were associated with shorter LOS (Table 4).
Table 5

Multivariable analysis of LOS for RTI victims included in INTRD, 2000-2004

LOS*

β

P

95% CI

β

P

95% CI

Sex

Female

−0.058

0.00

−0.088

−0.027

−0.052

0.00

−0.081

−0.022

Male**

0

   

0

   

Age groups

<= 4

−0.056

0.15

−0.133

0.021

    

5-14

−0.017

0.52

−0.067

0.034

    

15 - 29

0.005

0.82

−0.042

0.053

    

30 - 44

0.018

0.46

−0.03

0.066

    

45 - 59

−0.001

0.98

−0.05

0.048

    

60+**

0

       

Education

Illiterate

0.157

0.00

0.097

0.218

0.141

0.00

0.085

0.197

Elementary/Intermediate

0.129

0.00

0.074

0.183

0.121

0.00

0.069

0.174

High school

0.057

0.04

0.003

0.111

0.056

0.04

0.002

0.11

University**

0

   

0

   

Occupation

Retired

−0.091

0.01

−0.161

−0.021

−0.082

0.01

−0.145

−0.02

Armed forces

−0.045

0.22

−0.117

0.026

−0.038

0.30

−0.108

0.033

White collar worker

−0.031

0.12

−0.07

0.008

−0.02

0.28

−0.056

0.016

Blue collar worker

0.031

0.07

−0.002

0.065

0.046

0.00

0.017

0.076

Farmer

0.021

0.53

−0.045

0.087

0.036

0.27

−0.028

0.099

Others**

0

   

0

   

Road user type†

Pedestrian

0.096

0.00

0.037

0.155

0.1

0.00

0.041

0.158

Car occupant

0.044

0.16

−0.018

0.107

0.048

0.12

−0.013

0.11

Motorcyclist

0.079

0.01

0.019

0.139

0.083

0.01

0.024

0.143

Bicycle rider**

0

   

0

   

Medical insurance

No

−0.108

0.00

−0.13

−0.086

−0.109

0.00

−0.13

−0.087

Yes**

0

   

0

   

ISS

1-7

−0.194

0.00

−0.228

−0.16

−0.196

0.00

−0.23

−0.162

8-12

0.022

0.23

−0.014

0.058

0.022

0.23

−0.014

0.058

13+**

0

   

0

   

GCS

3-8

0.151

0.00

0.082

0.22

0.151

0.00

0.082

0.219

9-12

0.132

0.00

0.078

0.186

0.133

0.00

0.079

0.186

13-15**

0

   

0

   

Died in hospital

No

0.603

0.00

0.529

0.676

0.604

0.00

0.531

0.677

Yes**

0

   

0

   

RTI: Road traffic injury, INTRD: Iranian National Trauma Registry Database, LOS: length of stay, ISS: Injury Severity Score, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale.

*Model fitting information (final model): Deviance/chi-Square = 1154.949 (with d.f. of 6265 and P = 0.184).

**Reference group.

† The group “others” in road user type were not included in the analysis.

Use of safety equipment (seat-belt/helmet)

Even though very few patients reported use of safety equipment, we conducted an analysis to compare death rates, mean LOS and total hospital charges among patients who used seat-belts or helmets with patients who did not use them at the time of the collision. The analysis showed that in-hospital death for patients who used a seat-belt was 3.4% (three patients) compared to 6% (92 patients) for patients who did not use a seat-belt, however this difference failed to attain statistical significance (p=0.480). None of the injured patients who used safety helmets died in hospital compared to 3% (81 patients) of those who did not use a helmet. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.021).

The results indicate that the difference in hospital charges and LOS between the patients who did not use safety helmets and the patients who used helmets was not statistically significant (p=0.089 and p=0.154). The same results was obtained for the patients who used a seat-belt and the patients who did not use a seat-belt (p=0.126 and p=0.223 for LOS and hospital charges, respectively) (Table 3).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first national study and among few studies in the literature to analyze the association between socio-demographic factors, injury characteristics, health outcome and hospital charges and LOS among patients with RTI. The findings showed that hospital charges and LOS associated with RTIs varied by age, gender, socio-economic status, injury characteristics, health outcome of patients, and type of road users.

Although the average hospital charges in this study were lower compared to reports from HICs [69, 32], the increasing number of RTIs and deaths in Iran, impose a huge economic burden on the Iranian society. During the years 2000 to 2004, nearly one million people were injured and more than 100,000 died due to traffic crashes in Iran [3].

Local studies conducted in hospitals in Tehran city have reported LOS ranging from 5 to 7.8 for trauma patients in general [14, 3335], which is in line with the average LOS for RTI reported in this study. It is difficult to compare LOS between countries, due to variations in the organization of trauma care and differences in injury patterns and a comparison of our results with previous studies show conflicting results. The average LOS for RTI victims in the current study was similar to the results of one study done by Odero et al., measuring health care utilization among all types of injuries in one hospital in Indiana, USA [9]. On the other hand, the mean LOS in the current study was higher than in some other studies done in HICs [68, 32] and also in other LMICs [36]. In contrast, the average LOS for RTIs in the current study was lower than the average LOS for RTIs reported in Trinidad and Tobago [37], Kenya [38], Spain [39], New Zealand [40] and Greece [41]. The mean total hospital charges, on the other hand, were much lower in the current study compared to studies conducted in HICs [69, 32]. Some part of the lower hospital charges, compared with HICs, can be explained by the subsidized health care system and also the general low service costs in Iran.

The findings showed that hospital charges and LOS varied with age, gender, socio-economic status, injury characteristics and health outcome of the patients. Consistent with previous knowledge [11, 33, 34, 42], RTI victims in the current study were predominantly male (male–female ratio 3.4), mainly in productive age and from lower socioeconomic groups (both in terms of education and occupation). Men had longer LOS than women. The findings also showed that LOS decreased with increasing level of education. This result should be treated with caution since only 4% of the patients had university and higher level education. Shorter LOS in this group of patient might be explained partly by faster recovery due to self-care and better therapeutic compliance.

In line with other studies [6, 7, 10], patients with more severe injuries (higher ISS or lower GCS) had longer LOS and higher total hospital charges. LOS was, not surprisingly, a significant predictor of higher total hospital charges. This corroborates with other studies on the same topic in HICs [6, 7]. The findings also showed that being a blue-collar worker was associated with longer LOS. Based on the information in this study and previous studies in Iran [14, 3335], the severity of injury was higher among blue-collar workers (often characterized as lower socio-economic groups, and mainly vulnerable road users, such as motorcyclists or pedestrian, in the context of Iran) compared to white-collar and other occupation groups. Different pattern of injury among blue-collar workers compared with other occupation groups might contribute to longer hospitalization periods in this group.

An important finding of the current study was the low coverage of health insurances (more than half of the patients did not have any type of health insurance) and the significant effect of having insurance on hospital utilization. The findings showed that insured patients stayed longer in hospital compared to uninsured, after controlling with socio-demographic and injury-related factors. The findings support the conclusion that lack of health insurance coverage could be a barrier preventing or limiting access to care, although the limitations of the data do not allow conclusions as to whether those covered by health insurance had better health outcomes or have access to better quality care than those not covered. Another explanation for this result can be supplier-induced demand in hospital sector in the country. Similar results were found in two studies in the US, demonstrating that uninsured or self-paying children were charged less and had shorter LOS than children covered by Medicaid [6, 7]. On the other hand, a study conducted in Guadalajara, Mexico, indicated lower hospital costs for insured patients [43]. Insurance status has also been shown to be an important factor influencing utilization of health care services in general in Iran [22]. A new law was approved in Iran in 2008 (after the study period of the current study), which meant all hospital care for RTIs victims became free of charge. The effect of the new law has not been evaluated yet and further studies are needed to investigate the effect of the new law on hospital charges and LOS (and in general, resource burden) among RTI victims and also the effect of insurance on other types of traumas.

Studies have shown that patients who died during hospitalization incurred significantly higher hospital charges (mainly due to utilizing expensive intensive care during their hospitalization) but shorter LOS compared with patients who survived their injuries [6, 7]. The findings from the current study indicated that the patients who died in hospital had shorter LOS compared to those survived and there was no significant difference in total hospital charges between two groups, after controlling for other factors in the multivariable model.

The findings also showed that total hospital charges and LOS varied based on type of road users. Compared with other road users, being a pedestrian was associated with lower hospital charges but longer LOS. Longer LOS for pedestrians has also been reported in previous studies [40, 44]. The pattern of injury sustained by pedestrians (including head, spinal and lower extremity injuries), compared with other road users, could, to some extent, explain their longer hospital stay. Bicycle riders had higher hospital charges (but shorter LOS compared with other road users). This could be explained by higher risk of head injuries among cyclists resulting in expensive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

The findings indicated that use of safety equipment among the patients was very low and it did not have a significant effect on hospital charges and LOS. A new law making compulsory the use of seat-belts (for drivers and front seat passengers) and motorcycle helmets was introduced in 2001 in Iran, but based on the findings of the current study and a few other studies [13, 14, 33, 35], the use of helmets and seatbelts seem to be exceptionally low. However, figures from recently published studies have shown an increase in the rate of seat-belt use among car occupants [45, 46]. Research show that increased enforcement is one of the most effective methods to increase usage of safety equipment [1]. Since 2005 several interventions, including law enforcement of seat-belt and helmet use, have been implemented by the Traffic Police in Iran [47], however the effect of these intervention on usage of safety equipment has to be studied further

The positive effect of safety helmets and seat-belts on reducing fatal injuries is well-documented [1]. The findings of the current study that none of the patients who had used safety helmets died in hospital compared to 3% of those who had not used helmets and this difference was statistically significant. Previous studies have shown that not wearing a safety helmet or seat-belt is associated with higher hospital charges and longer LOS [1619]. However, the results of the current study showed no significant differences in hospital charges and LOS among the patients, who did not use safety helmets and seat-belts and those who used. These findings could be explained by the small number of patients who had used safety equipment in the country.

Another important finding of this study was that the majority of patients were transported to the hospitals by means of transport other than ambulances. Low usage of EMS ambulances has also been reported in other studies in Iran [14, 34, 48]. In addition, the average pre-hospital transportation time reported in the current study was longer than the reported time in previous studies in urban areas of Iran [34, 49, 50]. Two out of three studies [49, 50] which have investigating pre-hospital transportation time in Iran have measured only EMS ambulances transportation time (with average 10 and 18 minutes, recorded by EMS personnel), and one study [34] reported the average time for all transportation means (2 hours, reported by the patients). The transportation time in the current study was based on self-reports and it might have led to an over-estimation of the time. Moreover, since most patients admitted to the hospital in this study and previous studies in Iran [33, 34] had moderate injury severity (low ISS and high GCS), it can be concluded that many severely-injured patients die before reaching the hospital due to more severe crashes, long pre-hospital transportation time and, insufficient pre-hospital trauma care facilities [13, 51, 52].

INTRD is the largest trauma registry database in Iran, but it has some limitations that may affect the findings of this study. First, the database is hospital-based and might not be representative of the pattern of RTI in general. Second, the database excluded the patients who stayed at the hospital less than 24 hours. These patients may have received care at the ED and have been discharged or died in the ED (or before reaching the hospital) because of the severity of their injuries. Excluding these patients from the database may affect the results of the study by underestimating LOS and hospital charges and in general the burden of RTI. Third, total hospital charges are billed charges and do not reflect actual payments nor true hospital costs due to factors such as government subsidies to hospital services and medicines, discounts and exemptions given to some patients by the hospitals and also not including all out-of-pocket payments by the patients. Moreover, the non-medical direct costs such as transportation costs and the indirect costs related to lost productivity, as well as the costs associated with the pain and suffering by victims and relatives are not included. Measuring these costs, although important, was beyond the scope of this study. Fourth, information such as pre-hospital transportation time and use of safety equipment (safety helmet/seat belt) are self-reported. Therefore these two variables could be over-estimated, the first one because of recall bias and the second one based on false claims (to avoid legal consequences). Moreover, in cases when the patient was too ill to report this information, it was supplied by the accompanying person, which may have led to misreporting.

Despite these limitations, the findings demonstrate a significant morbidity and resource burden associated with RTIs. By describing epidemiology, hospital charges and LOS based on different socio-demographic groups and based on outcome and injury-related characteristics of patients, the findings of this study can be used for developing interventions to improve quality of care and outcome of the patients and also help to design targeted prevention measures. Primary prevention is the preferred means of reducing the impact of RTIs on the health sector, families, and society. Use of evidence-based interventions such as increasing use of safety equipment through law enforcement and public education can be enhanced in the context of the study in order to decrease traffic-related mortality and morbidities.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the hospital charges and LOS associated with RTI varied by age, gender, socio-economic status, injury characteristics and health outcome of the patients. This study showed that a majority of the patients were not insured and these patients have lower LOS than insured patients. Other important findings that need to be addressed in future research are the low usage of safety equipment and of EMS ambulances. The results of the study provide information that can be of importance in the planning and design of road traffic injury control strategies.

Endnote

a ICD-10 codes related to RTIs (fatal and nonfatal) included in the database: V02-V04 (0.1, 0.9), V09 (0.2, 0.3, 0.9), V12-V14 (0.3-0.9), V19.4-V19.6, V20-V28 (0.3-0.9), V29-V79 (0.4-0.9), V80.3-V80.5, V81.1, V82.1, V83-V86 (0–0.3), V87.0-V87.8, V89.2, V89.9.

Abbreviations

RTIs: 

Road traffic injuries

LMICs: 

Low- and middle-income countries

GNP: 

Gross national product

HIC: 

High income countries

DALYs: 

Disability adjusted life years

EMS: 

Emergency medical services

STSRC: 

Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center

INTRD: 

Iranian National Trauma Registry Database

ICD-10: 

International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

GCS: 

Glasgow Coma Scale

ISS: 

Injury Severity Score

LOS: 

length of stay

IRR: 

Iranian Rial.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. The authors would like to thank Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center for providing the data used in this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Global Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute
(2)
University College London, Institute for Global Health
(3)
Health Management and Economics Research Centre, Faculty of Management and Informatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
(4)
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
(5)
School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University

References

  1. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, Mathers C: World report on road traffic injury prevention. 2004, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhalla K, Shahraz S, Naghavi M, Bartels D, Murray C: Road Traffic Injuries in Iran. 2008, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Initiative for Global Health, Road Traffic Injury Health Metrics GroupGoogle Scholar
  3. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Zarei MR, Saadat S, Rasouli MR, Nouri M: Road traffic crashes in Iran from 1997 to 2007. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2009, 16 (3): 179-181. 10.1080/17457300903024277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Naghavi M, Jafari N, Alaeddini F, Akbari ME: Injury Epidemiology caused by external cause of injury in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2005, Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Health and Medical EducationGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization: Eastern Mediterranean status report on road safety: call for action. 2010, Cairo, Egypt: World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern MediterraneanGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardner R, Smith GA, Chany AM, Fernandez SA, McKenzie LB: Factors associated with hospital length of stay and hospital charges of motor vehicle crash related hospitalizations among children in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161 (9): 889-895. 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner KA, Williams LE, McKenzie LB, Shields BJ, Fernandez SA, Smith GA: Pediatric pedestrian injuries and associated hospital resource utilization in the United States. J Trauma. 2003, 68 (6): 1406-1412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shah S, Sinclair SA, Smith GA, Xiang H: Pediatric hospitalizations for bicycle-related injuries. Inj Prev. 2007, 13 (5): 316-321. 10.1136/ip.2007.016048.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Odero WW, Tierney WM, Einterz RM, Mungai S: Using an electronic medical record system to describe injury epidemiology and health care utilization at an inner-city hospital in Indiana. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004, 11 (4): 269-279. 10.1080/156609704/233/289616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen MC, Nielsen TG, Ridley S, Lecky FE, Morris S: Outcomes and costs of penetrating trauma injury in England and Wales. Injury. 2008, 39 (9): 1013-1025. 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mashreky SR, Rahman A, Khan TF, Faruque M, Svanstrom L, Rahman F: Hospital burden of road traffic injury: major concern in primary and secondary level hospitals in Bangladesh. Public Health. 2010, 124 (4): 185-189. 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hijar M, Arredondo A, Carrillo C, Solorzano L: Road traffic injuries in an urban area in Mexico. An epidemiological and cost analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2004, 36 (1): 37-42. 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00112-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Roudsari BS, Sharzei K, Zargar M: Sex and age distribution in transport-related injuries in Tehran. Accid Anal Prev. 2004, 36 (3): 391-398. 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00032-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zargar M, Sayyar Roudsari B, Shadman M, Kaviani A, Tarighi P: Pediatric transport related injuries in Tehran: the necessity of implementation of injury prevention protocols. Injury. 2003, 34 (11): 820-824. 10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00378-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sanaei-Zadeh H, Vahabi R, Nazparvar B, Amoei M: An epidemiological study and determination of causes of traffic accident-related deaths in Tehran, Iran (during 2000–2001). J Clin Forensic Med. 2002, 9 (2): 74-77. 10.1054/jcfm.2002.0547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hundley JC, Kilgo PD, Miller PR, Chang MC, Hensberry RA, Meredith JW, Hoth JJ: Non-helmeted motorcyclists: a burden to society? A study using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma. 2004, 57 (5): 944-949. 10.1097/01.TA.0000149497.20065.F4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eastridge BJ, Shafi S, Minei JP, Culica D, McConnel C, Gentilello L: Economic impact of motorcycle helmets: from impact to discharge. J Trauma. 2006, 60 (5): 978-983. 10.1097/01.ta.0000215582.86115.01.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Allen S, Zhu S, Sauter C, Layde P, Hargarten S: A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem. Acad Emerg Med. 2006, 13 (4): 427-434. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb00321.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerwin AJ, Griffen MM, Tepas JJ, Schinco MA, Pieper P, Devin T, Frykberg ER: The burden of noncompliance with seat belt use on a trauma center. J Trauma. 2006, 60 (3): 489-492. 10.1097/01.ta.0000204030.85070.ff.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. World Health Organization: Country profile of Iran. 2008, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Available at: http://www.emro.who.int/countries/irn/. (Accessed 20 Sep 2011)Google Scholar
  21. Statistical Center of Iran: Iran Statistical year book. 2010, Statistical Center of Iran, Available at: http://amar.sci.org.ir/index_e.aspx. (Accessed 20 Sep 2011)Google Scholar
  22. Hosseinpoor AR, Naghavi M, Alavian SM, Speybroeck N, Jamshidi H, Vega J: Determinants of seeking needed outpatient care in Iran: results from a national health services utilization survey. Arch Iran Med. 2007, 10 (4): 439-445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehrdad R: Health System in Iran. The Japan Medical Association Journal (JMAJ). 2009, 52 (1): 69-73.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank: Islamic Republic of Iran, Health Sector Review, Volume II: Background Sections. 2007, Washington DC: The World Bank Group, Human Development Sector, Middle East and North AfricaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ibrahimipour H, Maleki MR, Brown R, Gohari M, Karimi I, Dehnavieh R: A qualitative study of the difficulties in reaching sustainable universal health insurance coverage in Iran. Health policy and planning. 2011, 26 (6): 485-495. 10.1093/heapol/czq084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Khankeh H, Johansson E, Yarmohammadian MH, Hasselberg M: Exploring the provision of hospital trauma care for road traffic injury victims in Iran: a qualitative approach. J Inj Violence Res. 2013, 5 (1): 28-37. 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasouli MR, Moini M, Khaji A: Civilian traumatic vascular injuries of the upper extremity:report of the Iranian national trauma project. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 15 (6): 389-393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Salimi J, Nikoobakht MR, Khaji A: Epidemiology of urogenital trauma in Iran: results of the Iranian National Trauma Project. Urol J. 2006, 3 (3): 171-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moini M, Rasouli MR, Khaji A, Farshidfar F, Heidari P: Patterns of extremity traumas leading to amputation in Iran: results of Iranian National Trauma Project. Chin J Traumatol. 2009, 12 (2): 77-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneier AJ, Shields BJ, Hostetler SG, Xiang H, Smith GA: Incidence of pediatric traumatic brain injury and associated hospital resource utilization in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006, 118 (2): 483-492. 10.1542/peds.2005-2588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shields BJ, Comstock RD, Fernandez SA, Xiang H, Smith GA: Healthcare resource utilization and epidemiology of pediatric burn-associated hospitalizations, United States, 2000. J Burn Care Res. 2007, 28 (6): 811-826. 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181599b51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Coben JH, Steiner CA, Owens P: Motorcycle-related hospitalizations in the United States, 2001. Am J Prev Med. 2004, 27 (5): 355-362. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zargar M, Modaghegh MH, Rezaishiraz H: Urban injuries in Tehran: demography of trauma patients and evaluation of trauma care. Injury. 2001, 32 (8): 613-617. 10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00029-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Moini M, Rezaishiraz H, Zafarghandi MR: Characteristics and outcome of injured patients treated in urban trauma centers in Iran. J Trauma. 2000, 48 (3): 503-507. 10.1097/00005373-200003000-00023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zargar M, Khaji A, Karbakhsh M: Pattern of motorcycle-related injuries in Tehran, 1999 to 2000: a study in 6 hospitals. East Mediterr Health J. 2006, 12 (1–2): 81-87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Perez-Nunez R, Hijar-Medina M, Heredia-Pi I, Jones S, Silveira-Rodrigues EM: Economic impact of fatal and nonfatal road traffic injuries in Belize in 2007. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010, 28 (5): 326-336.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. St Bernard G, Matthews W: A contemporary analysis of road traffic crashes, fatalities and injuries in Trinidad and Tobago. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003, 10 (1–2): 21-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Odero W, Khayesi M, Heda PM: Road traffic injuries in Kenya: magnitude, causes and status of intervention. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003, 10 (1–2): 53-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bastida JL, Aguilar PS, Gonzalez BD: The economic costs of traffic accidents in Spain. J Trauma. 2004, 56 (4): 883-888. 10.1097/01.TA.0000069207.43004.A5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Langley JD, Phillips D, Marshall SW: Inpatient costs of injury due to motor vehicle traffic crashes in New Zealand. Accid Anal Prev. 1993, 25 (5): 585-592. 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90010-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Markogiannakis H, Sanidas E, Messaris E, Koutentakis D, Alpantaki K, Kafetzakis A, Tsiftsis D: Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category. Emerg Med J. 2006, 23 (1): 27-31. 10.1136/emj.2004.022392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Odero W, Garner P, Zwi A: Road traffic injuries in developing countries: a comprehensive review of epidemiological studies. Trop Med Int Health. 1997, 2 (5): 445-460. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.1997.tb00167.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Perez-Nunez R, Avila-Burgos L, Hijar-Medina M, Pelcastre-Villafuerte B, Celis A, Salinas-Rodriguez A: Economic impact of fatal and non-fatal road traffic injuries in Guadalajara Metropolitan Area and Jalisco. Mexico. Inj Prev. 2011, 17 (5): 297-303. 10.1136/ip.2010.027995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. DasGupta R, Roncal S, Hill D: Resource utilization by injured automobile occupants and pedestrians. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998, 68 (4): 271-274. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb02080.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Majdzadeh R, Eshraghian MR, Khalagi K, Motevalian A, Naraghi K: Crash-related factors associated with the severity of road traffic injuries in Iran. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2011, 18 (3): 175-180. 10.1080/17457300.2010.527991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohammadi G: The pattern of fatalities by age, seat belt usage and time of day on road accidents. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2009, 16 (1): 27-33. 10.1080/17457300802406963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Soori H, Royanian M, Zali AR, Movahedinejad A: Road traffic injuries in Iran: the role of interventions implemented by traffic police. Traffic Inj Prev. 2009, 10 (4): 375-378. 10.1080/15389580902972579.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pahlavan PS: Prognosis of trauma patients admitted to an emergency department in a developing country. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2006, 13 (2): 117-118. 10.1080/17457300500310129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Modaghegh MH, Roudsari BS, Sajadehchi A: Prehospital trauma care in Tehran: potential areas for improvement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002, 6 (2): 218-223. 10.1080/10903120290938580.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Bigdeli M, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Mohammadi R: Pre-hospital care time intervals among victims of road traffic injuries in Iran. A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 406-10.1186/1471-2458-10-406.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Hasselberg M, Khankeh H, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Johansson E: Barriers and facilitators to provide effective pre-hospital trauma care for road traffic injury victims in Iran: a grounded theory approach. BMC Emerg Med. 2010, 10: 20-10.1186/1471-227X-10-20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Haghparast Bidgoli H, Bogg L, Hasselberg M: Pre-hospital trauma care resources for road traffic injuries in a middle-income country–a province based study on need and access in Iran. Injury. 2011, 42 (9): 879-884. 10.1016/j.injury.2010.04.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/281/prepub

Copyright

© Haghparast-Bidgoli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement