Direct costs of inequalities in health care utilization in Germany 1994 to 2009: a top-down projection
© Kroll and Lampert; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 December 2012
Accepted: 3 July 2013
Published: 12 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Eric Kroll|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vassilis Aletras|
|17 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steinar Krokstad|
|18 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felipe Vasquez Lavin|
|11 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Eric Kroll|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steinar Krokstad|
|25 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vassilis Aletras|
|26 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felipe Vasquez Lavin|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|3 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-271|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.