Design of an online health-promoting community: negotiating user community needs with public health goals and service capabilities

  • Joakim Ekberg1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Toomas Timpka1, 2,

      Affiliated with

      • Marianne Angbratt2,

        Affiliated with

        • Linda Frank3,

          Affiliated with

          • Anna-Maria Norén4,

            Affiliated with

            • Lena Hedin3,

              Affiliated with

              • Emelie Andersen3,

                Affiliated with

                • Elin A Gursky5 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Boel Andersson Gäre6, 7

                    Affiliated with

                    BMC Health Services Research201313:258

                    DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-258

                    Received: 20 October 2012

                    Accepted: 28 June 2013

                    Published: 4 July 2013



                    An online health-promoting community (OHPC) has the potential to promote health and advance new means of dialogue between public health representatives and the general public. The aim of this study was to examine what aspects of an OHPC that are critical for satisfying the needs of the user community and public health goals and service capabilities.


                    Community-based participatory research methods were used for data collection and analysis, and participatory design principles to develop a case study OHPC for adolescents. Qualitative data from adolescents on health appraisals and perspectives on health information were collected in a Swedish health service region and classified into categories of user health information exchange needs. A composite design rationale for the OHPC was completed by linking the identified user needs, user-derived requirements, and technical and organizational systems solutions. Conflicts between end-user requirements and organizational goals and resources were identified.


                    The most prominent health information needs were associated to food, exercise, and well-being. The assessment of the design rationale document and prototype in light of the regional public health goals and service capabilities showed that compromises were needed to resolve conflicts involving the management of organizational resources and responsibilities. The users wanted to discuss health issues with health experts having little time to set aside to the OHPC and it was unclear who should set the norms for the online discussions.


                    OHPCs can be designed to satisfy both the needs of user communities and public health goals and service capabilities. Compromises are needed to resolve conflicts between users’ needs to discuss health issues with domain experts and the management of resources and responsibilities in public health organizations.


                    Community-based participatory research Health promotion Adolescents Health service


                    Health promotion denotes a set of principles for endorsement of the health of the population from an inclusive perspective. These principles differ from corresponding approaches for disease prevention, where epidemiological knowledge of specific health risks is used for prevention and early detection of particular diseases. The theoretical basis for health promotion is that health is determined in interaction with communities and their residents, and that changes in the physical and social living environment influence the health status [1]. Health is thus seen not only to reflect the absence of disease but also encompasses aspects such as capacity to fulfil vital life goals [2] and psychological well-being and outlook [3].

                    Due to the advances in web technology, Internet-based applications are now inexpensive alternatives for health promotion, e.g. by self-directed and informal learning in online communities. An online community refers to a gathering of individuals in a virtual space who form a network for long-term public discussions on common interests or experiences [4]. In contrast to geographic communities who share interests in physical tasks and activities, the emphasis in online communities is on learning and information exchange [5, 6]. Self-directed learning, where the individual is in command of what should be learned, stands in contrast to health education, where health experts provide information that they think the recipients need [7].

                    An online health-promoting community (OHPC) has the potential to promote health and advance new means of dialogue between public health representatives and the general public. In Sweden more than 90% of adolescents have Internet access and go online several times a week [8]. However, an OHPC must be managed and even if advances in web technologies simplify the initiation of online communities, management and maintenance must be sustainable. An online community involving the health care service needs to be in accordance with public health goals and service capacity. Public health representatives cannot be expected to invest time and funding in an intervention at odds with the goals of the public health service.

                    In Sweden, obesity among children has not yet matched the epidemic proportions reported from other parts of the world [912]. However, among adolescents, overweight and self-consciousness regarding body shape, diet and exercise influence their social, psychological and physical health [1315]. Obese children may be in need of secondary prevention because of the adverse effects related to obesity, such as development of coronary heart disease, related to long-term obesity [16], but it is less obvious what to prevent in the remaining population. General interventions, such as health education, to prevent overweight and obesity are problematic because of the lack of procedures that have general application [13, 17]. There is a need for personalized community-based health promotion [18]. Online interventions are especially suitable for this purpose when considering the amount of time adolescents spend online [19].

                    The aim of this study was to examine what aspects of an OHPC that are critical for satisfying the needs of the user community and public health goals and service capabilities. The study was performed in a health care region (population 1 200 000) in the south east of Sweden, where analyses of obesity data had shown that the need for obesity prevention among adolescents was greater than the resources available [20]. The results indicated that obese adolescents would benefit from more specialized interventions; a need for an online public health intervention addressing the non-obese adolescent population was also identified.


                    Community-based participatory research methods [21, 22] were used for the study and participatory design principles were used for the OHPC systems development [23]. Community-based participatory research methods provide an arrangement for balanced influence and control over research processes by non-academic researchers and support structures and processes for academic–community partnerships to improve health [24].

                    Qualitative data from adolescents on health appraisals and perspectives on health information were collected in a Swedish health service region. Using a three-step analysis, the data were transformed to specify the structure and functions of an OHPC intervention (Figure 1). In the first step, the crude data were analysed and structured into health information needs. The identified needs were then transformed into requirements for an OHPC intervention by an interdisciplinary expert team. In this context, needs refer to problems expressed that warrant a solution; requirements are associated with the design of an information system [25]. In the third step, a prototype based on the user-derived requirements was compared with regional public health goals and service capabilities by public health official representatives from the region, and modified accordingly. Conflicts between the system requirements derived from the adolescents and public health goals and resources were identified.
                    Figure 1

                    A three-step analysis to specify the structure and functions of an OHPC intervention.

                    Data collection

                    The model population for the development of the OHPC intervention consisted of high school students in their senior year (17–18 years of age). A convenience sample (n = 65) representing the population of adolescents aged 15–20 years (n ≈ 50 000) in the study region was recruited. Focus group interview sessions were arranged with adolescents according to two criteria: home community sociocultural profile (industrial–technological, small business–church dominated, small business–agricultural) and high school program profile (high school program in science, arts or nursing). High schools corresponding to the listed program profiles in each study community were contacted and asked for assistance with recruiting students for focus group meetings. Qualitative data were collected using two sets of focus group interviews. The topics for the first set of interviews were physical health, psychological health, and health products; the second set of interviews covered health information in the media, information needs and information-seeking behaviour. The protocol for the focus group sessions is provided in Additional file 1. Initially, each student was asked to participate in both focus groups but some cancellations occurred and stand-ins were accepted. Of the 65 participating adolescents, 48 participated in both sets of focus group interviews, 12 only in the first, and 5 only in the second. In total 18 focus group sessions took place.

                    Data from the focus groups were collected over a 2-month period in 2010. The focus groups were video recorded and lasted for approximately 90 minutes for the first occasion and 60 minutes for the second. In total, approximately 20 hours of video were collected. In each focus group, two moderators were present: one moderating the discussion and the other making observations. The data were collected by means of formal natural group discussion defined as a group interview with invited people who already know each other [26]. The resulting requirements and various prototypes were demonstrated and discussed with representatives from regional public health services in meetings and telephone conferences.

                    The focus groups took place after hours in the students’ free time; informed consent was obtained from the participants and with the permission of schools and teachers. The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Linköping University, Dnr: 479–31.

                    Data analysis

                    Step 1. Identification of health information exchange needs

                    An analysis of health information exchange needs was performed using data from the focus group meetings. Summaries from each focus group were compiled as transcripts from the video recordings by one of the moderators and sent to the second moderator of the focus group to make sure that the summary was accurate. The transcribed content was coded based on themes identified in the material by the first moderator.

                    Statements from the focus groups related to health information exchange were identified and a summative content analysis of these units was performed to identify specific user needs as related to an information system. In addition, statements regarding content and topics of interest were used to assist in drafting the content for the information system.

                    Step 2. User-derived requirements for the information system

                    A process to determine the user-derived system requirements was undertaken based on the principles of design space analysis [27, 28] with design rationales captured using an informal representation [29]. A design team consisting of two computer scientists, an interaction designer, and a cognitive scientist drafted the requirements for an OHPC based on the health information exchange needs identified. The design decisions were then constructed into a composite design rationale. A design rationale is an explicit list of decisions made during a design process, and the reasons why those decisions were made [30]. The design rationale primarily consisted of the identified user needs, the user-derived requirements, technical and organizational system solutions, alternative solutions, and the reason for their rejection when applicable. The design rationale was also presented as a prototype OHPC.

                    Step 3. Conflicts between user-derived requirements and regional public health goals and service capability

                    In the final step, the design rationale document and prototype were presented to a panel of six public health professionals working with adolescent obesity, representing the health service providers in the region. The task presented to the panel was to assess the prototype with regard to the regional public health goals and service capability for an OHPC intervention. Design solutions were reviewed in sessions at which the expected positive and negative consequences of each design solution were examined in light of its hypothetical implementation in the study setting. When conflicts between requirements, public health goals, and service capabilities were found, the solutions were adjusted in order to neutralize the conflicts. These adaptations were compiled, analysed for common features, and documented.


                    Step 1. Identification of health information exchange needs

                    All participants studied at their senior high school year (17–18 years of age), of which 69% were female. The focus group transcript was divided into 505 statement units related to health information exchange. These units were classified into ten categories of user health information exchange needs (Table 1); content-related needs were excluded. The most prominent content-related statements were about food, exercise, and well-being.
                    Table 1

                    User health information exchange needs

                    Focus group context

                    User health information exchange need

                    The adolescents exhibited impressive knowledge and had no shortage of simple health advice; they rather challenged traditional tenets of diet and exercise, not because they distrusted health advice, but because they distrusted everything. They did not lack information, but rather a method to discern the true from the false. Since almost everything health-related they know of is presented with the agenda of selling them a product, their rule of thumb was to generally disregard everything

                    The experience should be educational

                    Even though the adolescents disregarded information provided by health care organizations, they did believe that physicians and nurses could provide genuine useful advice. However, they also wanted a personal comment regarding their questions, not general advice addressing everyone

                    Personal advice from health professionals

                    Exploring subjects and seeing the point of view of others in discussion forums and boards was both appreciated and utilized among the adolescents; however, they had experienced saturation where the discussion was halted either because of lack of experts with more knowledge to inject into the discussion, or where a debate turned sour ending without any means to verify or check the validity of the claims given by either party

                    Discussions in which experts participate

                    The adolescents belong to a generation where most of their information sources are online and funded by ads, and where additional pages, reloads, and links increase the revenue of the website. It therefore was reported to be both a tedious and confusing task to access the content sought after

                    Easy accessible content

                    Most health-related information provided online was reported to be both abstract and general, or specific but provided to sell products. This included information from governmental sources and information from health care providers. There was reported a lack of information regarding the subjects they cared about and wanted to know more about

                    Information about our interests

                    Reading about faulty but widely held beliefs was seen as entertaining and informative, and the adolescents were fully aware that commercial interests both skewed the facts to push products, and also outright lied if they could get away with it. Having health professionals call this out was reported to be an exciting prospect

                    Dismantling of myths and misconceptions

                    Diets and types of exercise was an area where it was seen as very difficult to find useful information. Information from commercial interests was entirely distrusted, and since both diet and types of exercise are not only a comparison of efficiency, but also experience, sharing experiences among themselves was seen as valuable

                    Be able to share tips and experiences

                    The aesthetics of websites was reported to be used as a tool to determine the underlying agenda, trustworthiness, and target group of the website. In this process, very attractive sites could be immediately dismissed because it was apparent that such sites were drafted to push products. A clean, simple, professional site with a clear manifesto and clear agenda was seen as important for credibility among the adolescents

                    Professional and serious

                    One critique of the communication from the scientific community and health care providers was its reliance on a wall of text. Adolescents are sometimes accused of lacking attention span and in need of simple accessible short bursts of information. However, the adolescents reported that they were so overwhelmed by information that it has become necessary to be able to use heuristics to determine gold from grit. There was no aversion to in-depth information; rather there is a need to have very concise and simple introductions

                    Concise presentation

                    Even good communities were reported to be shunned because of bad manners and uncivil conduct. Moreover, it was emphasized that once a community gets a certain vibe, it sticks forever

                    Maintain a civil discourse

                    Step 2. User-derived requirements for the information system

                    The structures and functions identified as requirements to satisfy the adolescents’ health information exchange needs included both technical and organizational components. A composite design rationale for the OHPC was completed by linking the identified user needs, user-derived requirements, and technical and organizational system solutions. When applicable, alternative solutions and the reason for their rejection were also listed (Table 2).
                    Table 2

                    Reconstructed design rationales

                    Adolescent user need

                    Adolescent user-derived requirement

                    Design solution

                    Alternative solutions and reasons for rejection

                    Technical system

                    Organizational system

                    The experience should be educational

                    The intervention must be able to facilitate self-directed learning

                    Online discussion forum where the system aids in keeping track of new posts in areas of interest, requiring a user registration and user management system

                    Text/video chat, wiki, podcast/vodcasts, and blogs all violated a combination of other needs such as professional and serious, concise presentation and civil discourse

                    Personal advice from health professionals

                    Participation by health professionals who can be accessed

                    An online system for presenting experts and the ability to ask and get answers from experts

                    An expert panel representing the key public health areas available for regular questioning


                    Discussions in which experts participate

                    Active participation by experts in a forum

                    An online discussion forum. Distinguishable user groups with different levels of authority

                    An expert panel that is willing to publicly engage in online discussions

                    A chat setup would satisfy this requirement, however there is less opportunity to satisfy the need of civil discourse and the need to exchange tips and experiences would be severely hampered

                    Information about our interests

                    User driven content

                    Reasonably accessible and permanent record of online discussions

                    Editorial content based on online discussion surveillance


                    Easy accessible content

                    Simple categorical organization and presentation of content

                    Organization and presentation of content into a minimal set of categories. Content management system for categorization and presentation



                    Dismantling of myths and misconceptions

                    Provide commentary on prevalent myths and misconceptions

                    Provision of intuitive methods for production of editorial material

                    Provision of editorial content by health care professionals based on current events and health-related media reports


                    Be able to share tips and experiences

                    Provide means for users to post content

                    An online forum with registered user id with suitable categories. A user registration and management system

                    User blogs. The interest in blogging was assessed to be low, and problems of regulating what was off-topic made this undesirable

                    Professional and serious

                    A clean and minimalistic layout free from commercial interests

                    A content management system without ads. Design of an appropriate layout

                    Maintenance of layout integrity and content management

                    Maintenance of active communities without a content management system is prone to errors and mistakes in updates and layouts. A free and simple content management system with extensive community support dramatically reduces the load of maintenance

                    Concise presentation

                    Conform content to blogesque (short and sweet) format

                    A system to post videos and organize short articles

                    Utilize blogesque newsfeed and short video interviews

                    Editorial work on content; however, the work load involved was deemed to be high

                    Maintain a civil discourse

                    Vigilant moderation

                    Provide means for moderation of discussions

                    Enough moderators to keep up with online activity

                    Use of strict rules of conduct to educate users was discussed, but there will always be abuse online

                    Step 3. Conflicts between the user-derived requirements and regional public health goals and service capability

                    The assessment of the design rationale document and prototype in light of the regional public health goals and service capabilities raised concerns about organizational aspects of the design solutions. No technical aspects of the design solution were found to be problematic. In brief, compromises were needed to resolve conflicts involving the management of organizational resources and responsibilities.

                    Two conflicts arose about making a health panel available for questions from adolescents and engaging practitioners in online discussions to meet the adolescents’ needs (personal advice from health professionals and discussions in which experts participate). With regard to the resources at hand, monitoring the potentially vast number of questions and discussions was deemed to be too high a workload for the practitioners. The compromise found was to use a previously rejected design solution of using vodcasts. To produce the vodcasts, it was decided to appoint a community manager to monitor the discussion, collect questions and hot topics, and regularly interview the practitioners. A similar problem occurred when the practitioners were expected to produce editorial content as comments on current health-related events and media reports to meet the need for dismantling of myths and misconceptions. Because of the need for special care when producing material for the public from health services, these editorials were deemed to demand too much work. The compromise found was to transfer this responsibility to public health academics because they are more familiar with producing editorial material, and public communications from them would not be seen to come from the regional health service.

                    The fourth conflict was on the choice of OHPC editorial content based on monitoring of online discussions in order to meet the adolescents’ need for information about our interests. It was speculated that the editorial content would then be focused exclusively on topics with low priority in public health policies, e.g. make-up and skincare products. However, the practitioners were sympathetic to an approach to adapt the editorial content to adolescents’ interests and a compromise was decided whereby monitoring was to be accompanied by a clear statement of the purpose and focus of the OHPC.

                    The fifth conflict was about the moderators keeping up with the online activity if the OHPC intervention was used extensively, regarding the need to maintain a civil discourse. The compromise agreed on involved recruiting moderators from members of the adolescent user community based on exemplary conduct.


                    This study set out to examine what aspects of an OHPC that are critical for satisfying the needs of user communities and public health goals and service capabilities. The most important observation was that compromises in the OHPC design were needed to resolve conflicts between needs to discuss health issues with domain experts in the end-user population and resources and responsibilities related to online activities in the public health organization. In a comparable OHPC development initiative in Ontario, Canada (http://​www.​youthspark.​ca), a method for systems development and evaluation of an OHPC has been comprehensively documented [31]. The current results add knowledge about the need to negotiate public health interests and end-user needs in the OHPC design process.

                    Web technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in health services [32, 33]. In a recent review of computer and web-based interventions to increase physical activity among adolescents, most reported interventions had led to a significant increase in physical activity, but the effects were short lived [34]. Experiences from smoking cessation programs suggest that using only Internet initiatives based on social cognitive theory is not effective [35], but that a combination of cell phone-based “push” technologies, peer-to-peer contact, and web-based information on health and coping strategies can be a promising long-term treatment option [36]. In parallel, online communities providing several of the latter services to users have been used in health services for self-management of health problems [37] and establishment of communities of practice [38]. An OHPC can be regarded as a community-based, long-term, and inclusive health promotion program [1], although mediated over the Internet. When such OHPCs are developed on a large scale, the existing models for health promotion program implementation and evaluation must also be extended to fit the virtual setting. The OHPCs have to be evaluated with regard to behavioural patterns and health effects in the intended population. In these evaluations, there is thus a need to measure the outreach, usage, and effectiveness of the online system, using methods ranging from web surveys and focus groups to epidemiological studies. Such large-scale evaluations of OHPC designs in practice settings are much warranted, but also associated with considerable methodological challenges.

                    Participatory design proponents suggest that because social factors important in the implementation process are highlighted in a participatory approach, the resulting system designs are more sustainable compared with those developed using traditional systems development methods [39]. However, participatory methods have also been criticized for neglecting the later technical development stages [40] and being unrealistic with regard to the time investments demanded by practitioners [41]. Techniques such as the Voice of the Customer table and House of Quality [42] are well-established but resource-consuming approaches to the technical system accurateness problem. For instance, a possible problem with an OHPC initiative is that it may encourage young people to post and discuss health issues and problems in a manner that they later may come to regret. Even though it is easy to censor content after the fact, information online tends to persist. The use of design rationales in this study enabled public health practitioners to document this design problem, and analyse their views on the consequences of possible solutions. However, these views needed to be scrutinized also by engineers and legal expert before being implemented. This example illustrates that a participatory design process must be structured to include not only a representative group of end-users, but also the necessary expertise. If the experts not are available in the primary process, they have to be recruited downstream to adjust and approve the final systems design. For less complicated design problems, consultation of the scientific literature may be satisfactory. For the example problem, it is possible that consultation review of privacy guidelines for social media and maturation of online behaviour may have been sufficient to reduce the risks associated with sharing online [43].

                    The study has several limitations that need to be taken into account when interpreting the results. Allowing practitioners and the target community to influence the qualitative analysis process may be interpreted as surrendering control of the study. However, in accordance with the suggested increased use of qualitative data from in-depth interviews and observations for evaluating the context, process, impact, and outcome of community-based interventions [21, 4448], we contend that the participatory method used in this study is adequate for capturing the context and process of the community development. In such interventions, experimental control may be incongruous when taking the different sociopolitical structures of communities into account [44, 46, 49]. To ensure contextual soundness, the practitioners were in this study included in their actual professional roles, and the adolescents were regarded as the primary end-users, rather than merely informants. Also, including adolescents from the end-user community from several municipalities and school programs in the research was an attempt to decrease the threats to soundness that are associated with a convenience sample and that the adolescents would be disingenuous.


                    The study shows that an OHPC can be designed to satisfy both the needs of the user community and public health goals and service capabilities. The main results are that compromises in OHPC design are needed to resolve conflicts between needs and requirements to discuss health issues with domain experts in the end-user population and the management of resources and responsibilities related to online activities in the public health organization.



                    Online health-promoting community.



                    The study was funded by a research grant from the Research Council for South-East Sweden (FORSS). The funding agency did not influence the research process in any aspect. We are grateful to all public health officials and adolescents in the region who made this study possible.

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University
                    Centre for Public Health Sciences, Östergötland County Council
                    Department of Health, Jönköping County Council
                    Centre for Public Health, Kalmar County Council
                    Analytic Services Inc
                    Futurum, Jönköping County Council
                    Jönköpings Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University


                    1. Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative Methods for Health Research (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series). 2nd edition. London: Sage; 2004.
                    2. Nordenfelt L: On the Nature of Health. Amsterdam: Kluwer; 2nd, revised edn. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995.View Article
                    3. Snyder CR, Lopez SJ: Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Exploration of Human Strengths. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
                    4. Rheingold H: The Virtual Community. New York: Addison-Wesley; 1993.
                    5. Lave J, Wenger E: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.View Article
                    6. Ekberg J, Ericson L, Timpka T, Eriksson H, Nordfeldt S, Hanberger L, Ludvigsson J: Web 2.0 systems supporting childhood chronic disease management: design guidelines based on information behaviour and social learning theories. J Med Syst 2010, 34:107–117.PubMedView Article
                    7. Brydges R, Nair P, Ma I, Shanks D, Hatala R: Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 2012,46(7):648–656.PubMedView Article
                    8. Medierådet: Ungar & Medier: Fakta om barns och ungas användning och upplevelser av medier. Stockholm: Kulturdepartementet; 2010. ISSN-1102–447X
                    9. Lissner L, Sohlström A, Sundblom E, Sjöberg A: Trends in overweight and obesity in Swedish schoolchildren 1999–2005: has the epidemic reached a plateau? Obes Rev 2010, 11:553–559.PubMedView Article
                    10. Bergström E, Blomquist HK: Is the prevalence of overweight and obesity declining among 4-year-old Swedish children? Acta Paediatr 2009, 98:1956–1958.PubMedView Article
                    11. Sjöberg A, Lissner L, Albertsson-Wikland K, Mårild S: Recent anthropometric trends among Swedish school children: evidence for decreasing prevalence of overweight in girls. Acta Paediatr 2008, 97:118–123.PubMedView Article
                    12. Fåhraeus C, Wendt L, Nilsson M, Isaksson H, Alm A, Andersson-Gäre B: Overweight and obesity in twenty-year-old Swedes in relation to birthweight and weight development during childhood. Acta Paediatr 2012, 101:637–642.PubMedView Article
                    13. Shaw SM, Kemeny L: Fitness promotion for adolescent girls: the impact and effectiveness of promotional material which emphasizes the slim ideal. Adolescence 1989, 24:677–687.PubMed
                    14. Setiloane K: Being overweight: negative outcomes for African American adolescents. Nutr Health 2004, 18:61–66.PubMedView Article
                    15. Powers PS, Bruty H: Pharmacotherapy for eating disorders and obesity. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 2009, 18:175–187.View Article
                    16. Owen CG, Whincup PH, Whincup PH, Cook DG, Osmond C, Eriksson JG, Kaye SJ, Rudnicka AR, Chou QA, Orfei L: Is body mass index before middle age related to coronary heart disease risk in later life? Evidence from observational studies. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009, 33:866–877.View Article
                    17. Carter OB: The weighty issue of Australian television food advertising and childhood obesity. Health Promot J Austr 2006, 17:5–11.PubMed
                    18. Anderson AS: How to implement dietary changes to prevent the development of metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr 2000, 83:165–168.View Article
                    19. Kind T: The Internet as an adjunct for pediatric primary care. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009, 21:805–810.PubMedView Article
                    20. Ekberg J, Angbratt M, Valter L, Nordvall M, Timpka T: History matters: childhood weight trajectories as a basis for planning community-based obesity prevention to adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012, 36:524–528.View Article
                    21. Israel BA, Schultz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 1998, 19:173–202.PubMedView Article
                    22. Andrews JO, Newman SD, Meadows O, Cox MJ, Bunting S: Partnership readiness for community-based participatory research. Health Educ Res 2012, 27:555–571.PubMedView Article
                    23. Sjöberg C, Timpka T: Participatory design of information systems in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998, 5:177–183.PubMedView Article
                    24. Israel BA, Schultz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Educ Health 2001, 14:182–197.View Article
                    25. Löwgren J: Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’95). New York: ACM Press; 1995:87–95.
                    26. Green J, Tones K: Health Promotion. 2nd edition. London: Sage; 2010.
                    27. Maclean A, Young RM, Moran T: Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact, CHI '89 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Wings for the Mind. New York: ACM Press; 1989:247–252.View Article
                    28. Bellotti VME, MacLean A, Moran T: Structuring the design space by formulating appropriate design rationale questions. SIGCHI Bull 1991, 23:80–81.View Article
                    29. Lee J: Design rationale systems: understanding the issues. IEEE Expert 1997, 12:78–85.View Article
                    30. Jarczyk AP, Löffler P, Shipman III FM: Design rationale for software engineering: a survey. Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System, Sciences 1992, 2:577–586.View Article
                    31. Valaitis R, O’Mara L, Bezaire S: Tailoring Online Health Promotion: A Toolkit for Communities. University School of Nursing: Produced by Huron County Health Unit and McMaster; 2007.
                    32. Nicholas J: The role of internet technology and social branding in improving the mental health and wellbeing of young people. Perspect Public Health 2010, 130:86–90.PubMedView Article
                    33. Mockford C, Stansizewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S: The impact of patient and public involvement of UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012, 24:28–38.PubMedView Article
                    34. Hamel LM, Robbins LB, Wilbur J: Computer- and web-based interventions to increase preadolescent and adolescent physical activity: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2010, 67:251–268.PubMedView Article
                    35. Mason D, Gilbert H, Sutton S: Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): a randomised trial. Addiction 2012,107(12):2183–2190.PubMedView Article
                    36. Bredryen H, Drozd F, Kraft P: A digital smoking cessation program delivered through internet and cell phone without nicotine replacement (happy ending): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2008, 10:e51.View Article
                    37. Li LC, Townsend AF, Badley EM: Self-management intervention in the digital age: new approaches to support people with rheumatologic conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012, 26:321–333.PubMedView Article
                    38. Barnett RS, Jones SC, Bennett S, Iverson D, Bonney A: General practice training and virtual communities of practice – a review of the literature. BMC Fam Pract 2012, 13:87.PubMedView Article
                    39. Floyd C, Mehl WM, Reisin FM, Schmidt G, Wolf G: Out of Scandinavia: alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human–Comput Interact 1989, 4:253–350.View Article
                    40. Tollmar K: Towards CSCW design in the Scandinavian tradition. Doctoral Thesis. Stockholm: Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science, Stockholm University; 2001.
                    41. Hirschheim R: Assessing participative systems design: some conclusions from an exploratory study. Inform Manage 1983, 6:13–32.View Article
                    42. Hallberg N, Timpka T, Eriksson H: The medical software quality deployment method. Methods Inform Med 1999, 38:66–73.
                    43. Subrahmanyam K, Greenfield P: Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future Child 2008, 18:119–146.PubMedView Article
                    44. Susser M: The tribulations of trials-intervention in communities. Am J Public Health 1995, 85:156–158.PubMedView Article
                    45. Israel BA, Cummings KM, Dignan MB, Heaney CA, Perales DP, Simons-Morton BG, Zimmerman MA: Evaluation of health education programs: current assessment and future directions. Health Educ Q 1995, 22:364–389.PubMedView Article
                    46. Mittelmark MB, Hunt MK, Heath GW, Schmid TL: Realistic outcomes: lessons from community-based research and demonstration programs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Public Health Policy 1993, 14:437–462.PubMedView Article
                    47. Koepsell TD, Wagner EH, Cheadle AC, Patrick DL, Martin DC, Diehr PH, Perrin EB, Kristal AR, Allan-Andrilla CH, Dey LJ: Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs. Annu Rev Public Health 1992, 13:31–57.PubMedView Article
                    48. Sorensen G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Johnston D: I mplications of the results of community intervention trials . Annu Rev Public Health 1998, 19:379–416.PubMedView Article
                    49. Green LW, Richard L, Potvin L: Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promot 1996, 10:270–281.PubMedView Article
                    50. Pre-publication history

                      1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1472-6963/​13/​258/​prepub


                    © Ekberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.