Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model
© Ikkersheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 February 2012
Accepted: 1 May 2013
Published: 16 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiaan Lako|
|21 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivier Busch|
|29 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadine Meskens|
|12 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - David Ikkersheim|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivier Busch|
|25 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiaan Lako|
|31 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadine Meskens|
|24 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - David Ikkersheim|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - David Ikkersheim|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-220|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.