Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of an integrated system for classification, assessment and comparison of services for long-term care in Europe: the eDESDE-LTC study

  • Luis Salvador-Carulla1, 2Email author,
  • Javier Alvarez-Galvez3,
  • Cristina Romero2,
  • Mencia R Gutiérrez-Colosía2,
  • Germain Weber4,
  • David McDaid5,
  • Hristo Dimitrov6,
  • Lilijana Sprah7,
  • Birgitte Kalseth8,
  • Giuseppe Tibaldi9,
  • Jose A Salinas-Perez3,
  • Carolina Lagares-Franco11,
  • Maria Teresa Romá-Ferri12 and
  • Sonia Johnson10
BMC Health Services Research201313:218

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-218

Received: 4 July 2012

Accepted: 6 June 2013

Published: 15 June 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Colaert
12 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
1 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Colaert
24 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
3 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Colaert
21 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Javier Alvarez-Galvez
Resubmission - Version 7
21 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
22 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dirk Colaert
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
6 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-218

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Disability Research and Policy Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney
(2)
Scientific Association PSICOST
(3)
Área de Salud y Política Social, Universidad Loyola Andalucía
(4)
Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Vienna
(5)
LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Sciences
(6)
Public Health Association
(7)
Sociomedical Institute, Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
(8)
Department of Health Research, SINTEF Technology and Society
(9)
Centro Studi e Ricerche in Psichiatria ASLT02
(10)
Mental Health Sciences Unit, University College London
(11)
Área de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Cádiz
(12)
Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Alicante

Advertisement