Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Compliance with clinical guidelines for whiplash improved with a targeted implementation strategy: a prospective cohort study

  • Trudy Rebbeck1Email author,
  • Luciana G Macedo2 and
  • Christopher G Maher3
Contributed equally
BMC Health Services Research201313:213

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-213

Received: 12 February 2013

Accepted: 30 May 2013

Published: 13 June 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
12 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
4 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Van der Wees
17 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Trudy Rebbeck
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2013 Editorially accepted
13 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-213

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney
Common Spinal Disorders Research Group, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta
The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney