Influences of hospital information systems, indicator data collection and computation on reported Dutch hospital performance indicator scores
© Anema et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 May 2012
Accepted: 15 May 2013
Published: 12 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Anema|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Anema|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabina Nuti|
|11 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Pia Fantini|
|3 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Anema|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-212|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.