Using concept mapping to explore why patients become lost to follow up from an antiretroviral therapy program in the Zomba District of Malawi
© Rachlis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 2 October 2012
Accepted: 1 June 2013
Published: 11 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chima Onoka|
|8 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim|
|22 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Monique van Lettow|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim|
|18 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chima Onoka|
|13 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Monique van Lettow|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-210|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.