Willingness to pay for physician services at a primary contact in Ukraine: results of a contingent valuation study
© Danyliv et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 May 2012
Accepted: 3 June 2013
Published: 8 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andriy Danyliv|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Gil Lacruz|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Khanh Toan Pham|
|26 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Andriy Danyliv|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Gil Lacruz|
|24 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Andriy Danyliv|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|24 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|3 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-208|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.