The implementation of nice guidance on venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis: a before-after observational study to assess the impact on patient safety across four hospitals in England
© Bateman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 July 2012
Accepted: 1 June 2013
Published: 4 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Gallagher|
|31 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wei Huang|
|5 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Alice Bateman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wei Huang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-203|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.