Pregnant women’s experiences of routine counselling and testing for HIV in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative study
© Rujumba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 May 2012
Accepted: 16 May 2013
Published: 24 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frederic Le Marcis|
|1 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsitsi Masvawure|
|4 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - annabel Desgrees-du-Lou|
|2 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Rujumba|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsitsi Masvawure|
|22 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frederic Le Marcis|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-189|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.