Economic evaluation of agomelatine relative to other antidepressants for treatment of major depressive disorders in Greece
© Maniadakis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 November 2012
Accepted: 1 May 2013
Published: 10 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hubertus Himmerich|
|24 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Blanca-Tamayo Milagrosa|
|8 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Georgia Kourlaba|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Georgia Kourlaba|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Georgia Kourlaba|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|28 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|10 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-173|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.