Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sensitivity and specificity of Norwegian optometrists’ evaluation of diabetic retinopathy in single-field retinal images – a cross-sectional experimental study

BMC Health Services Research201313:17

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-17

Received: 16 March 2012

Accepted: 17 November 2012

Published: 10 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vibeke Sundling
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel North
30 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah
31 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vibeke Sundling
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vibeke Sundling
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vibeke Sundling
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Vibeke Sundling
Resubmission - Version 7
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
17 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Optometry and Visual Science, Buskerud University College
(2)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo
(3)
HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital
(4)
Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo

Advertisement