Hospital laboratory reporting may be a barrier to detection of ‘microsize’ myocardial infarction in the US: an observational study
© Safford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 April 2012
Accepted: 26 April 2013
Published: 1 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - stella gwini|
|6 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hugo Katus|
|27 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Monika Safford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hugo Katus|
|30 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - stella gwini|
|25 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Monika Safford|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-162|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.