Is 50 cent the price of the optimal copayment? - a qualitative study of patient opinions and attitudes in response to a 50 cent charge on prescription drugs in a publicly funded health system in Ireland
© Sinnott et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 September 2012
Accepted: 28 December 2012
Published: 10 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannu Valtonen|
|30 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Ingrid Schafheutle|
|4 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah-Jo Sinnott|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannu Valtonen|
|19 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ellen Ingrid Schafheutle|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-16|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.