Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Developing a questionnaire to identify perceived barriers for implementing the Dutch physical therapy COPD clinical practice guideline

  • Philip J van der Wees1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Cor AM Zagers2,
  • Sara E de Die2,
  • Erik JM Hendriks2,
  • Maria WG Nijhuis-van der Sanden1 and
  • Rob A de Bie2
BMC Health Services Research201313:159

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-159

Received: 15 September 2012

Accepted: 25 April 2013

Published: 1 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Signe Flottorp
22 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nadine Dougall
29 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Philip Van der Wees
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
1 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-159

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Department of Epidemiology and CAPHRI School for public health and primary care, Maastricht University
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School