Patient neglect in healthcare institutions: a systematic review and conceptual model
© Reader and Gillespie; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 July 2012
Accepted: 24 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nick Sevdalis|
|6 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alastair Ross|
|8 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tom Reader|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alastair Ross|
|12 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tom Reader|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tom Reader|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-156|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.