Motivation and incentives of rural maternal and neonatal health care providers: a comparison of qualitative findings from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania
© Prytherch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 February 2012
Accepted: 22 April 2013
Published: 25 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bruno Marchal|
|15 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Orach|
|2 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Prytherch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bruno Marchal|
|22 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Prytherch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|25 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-149|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.