Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Constructing a questionnaire for assessment of awareness and acceptance of diversity in healthcare institutions

Contributed equally
BMC Health Services Research201313:145

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-145

Received: 30 August 2012

Accepted: 17 April 2013

Published: 22 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jalal Safipour
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jalal Safipour
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jalal Safipour
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jalal Safipour
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shoa-Jen Perng
24 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Schim
8 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jalal Safipour
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
21 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shoa-Jen Perng
30 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Schim
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
17 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-145

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Karolinska Institutet, Neurobiology, Care Science and Society, Aging Research Centre
(2)
Seattle University, College of Nursing
(3)
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta

Advertisement