Factors influencing research engagement: research interest, confidence and experience in an Australian speech-language pathology workforce
© Finch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 April 2012
Accepted: 7 April 2013
Published: 19 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Mullan|
|12 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kath Weston|
|16 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Staines|
|15 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Steven McPhail|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Staines|
|1 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judy Mullan|
|13 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Steven McPhail|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Steven McPhail|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-144|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.