Emergency and critical care services in Tanzania: a survey of ten hospitals
© Baker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 June 2012
Accepted: 21 March 2013
Published: 16 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Talmor|
|14 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mike English|
|13 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mike English|
|5 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Baker|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mike English|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|16 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-140|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.