Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Emergency and critical care services in Tanzania: a survey of ten hospitals

  • Tim Baker1, 2Email author,
  • Edwin Lugazia3,
  • Jaran Eriksen4,
  • Victor Mwafongo3,
  • Lars Irestedt1, 2 and
  • David Konrad1, 2
BMC Health Services Research201313:140

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-140

Received: 28 June 2012

Accepted: 21 March 2013

Published: 16 April 2013

Abstract

Background

While there is a need for good quality care for patients with serious reversible disease in all countries in the world, Emergency and Critical Care tends to be one of the weakest parts of health systems in low-income countries. We assessed the structure and availability of resources for Emergency and Critical Care in Tanzania in order to identify the priorities for improving care in this neglected specialty.

Methods

Ten hospitals in four regions of Tanzania were assessed using a structured data collection tool. Quality was evaluated with standards developed from the literature and expert opinion.

Results

Important deficits were identified in infrastructure, routines and training. Only 30% of the hospitals had an emergency room for adult and paediatric patients. None of the seven district and regional hospitals had a triage area or intensive care unit for adults. Only 40% of the hospitals had formal systems for adult triage and in less than one third were critically ill patients seen by clinicians more than once daily. In 80% of the hospitals there were no staff trained in adult triage or critical care. In contrast, a majority of equipment and drugs necessary for emergency and critical care were available in the hospitals (median 90% and 100% respectively. The referral/private hospitals tended to have a greater overall availability of resources (median 89.7%) than district/regional hospitals (median 70.6).

Conclusions

Many of the structures necessary for Emergency and Critical Care are lacking in hospitals in Tanzania. Particular weaknesses are infrastructure, routines and training, whereas the availability of drugs and equipment is generally good. Policies to improve hospital systems for the care of emergency and critically ill patients should be prioritised.

Keywords

Emergency medicine Critical care Health services Quality of health care Developing countries Africa Tanzania Triage

Background

Emergency and Critical Care (EaCC) is one of the weakest parts of health systems in low-income countries [1]. Defined as the care given in hospital to patients with serious reversible disease, EaCC encompasses both the emergency care on arrival plus the care of inpatients when in a critical state. There is a need for EaCC in all countries in the world, irrespective of local resources [2]. The global burden of critical illness is difficult to quantify but is especially high in developing countries [3, 4]. Ninety percent of trauma deaths and ninety percent of deaths from pneumonia, meningitis and other infections occur in low or middle income countries [5, 6]. Ninety-nine percent of global maternal mortality is in developing countries [7]. Seventy-Five percent of the 7.6 million children under 5 who die each year worldwide are in Africa or Asia [8]. Fifty percent of child deaths in hospitals in developing countries occur within 24 hours of arriving at the hospital [9].

Although the majority of critically ill patients in developing countries are children and young adults, reported fatality rates are high: mortality for severe head injury in Benin is 70% and mortality for septic shock in Tunisia is 82% [10]. Several studies have reported deficiencies in care for seriously ill children [11, 12] and in emergency obstetric care [13] in low-income countries. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies looking at the quality of EaCC across all disciplines and no single-country analyses of EaCC services [14].

Tanzania is a politically stable, low-income country in East Africa. With a population of 44 million, Tanzania is ranked 152 out of 187 countries in the Human Development Index [15] (see Table 1). While Tanzania has some discipline-specific guidelines such as for obstetrics [16] or malaria [17], there are no national guidelines specifically for EaCC. The state of the services provided for the critically ill in Tanzania is largely unknown. In this study we aim to describe the structure and availability of hospital resources for EaCC in Tanzania as a starting point for the identification of priorities for improving care for this neglected patient group.
Table 1

Tanzania demographics

Population

44 million

Gross National Income per capita (US Dollars)

1430

Life Expectancy at birth (years)

55

Physicians (per 100,000 population)

0.1

Under-five mortality rate (per 1000)

76

Maternal mortality ratio (per 100,000 live births)

460

All data from World Health Statistics 2012 [18].

Methods

There are 21 regions in mainland Tanzania and 223 hospitals [19]. Ten hospitals were selected for study feasibility from four regions of the country using convenience sampling, ensuring a mix of district, regional, referral-level and private hospitals. The hospitals were studied on single day visits by two of the investigators (EL and TB) between October and November 2009 after prior telephone contact. The investigators conducted the first five visits together so as to harmonise the conduct of the visits and how to collect the data. The subsequent five visits were done by a single investigator (two by EL, three by TB). The data was collected using a structured tool which further ensured consistency in data collection. A structured interview was conducted with the head of the hospital and all areas of the hospital involved in EaCC were visited and the facilities assessed using a data collection tool divided into hospital specialties to ensure that the facilities for all patient groups were observed (available in the Additional file 1).

As there have not been any published Tanzanian or international guidelines specifically for EaCC in low-income countries, we first developed a set of standards. Three of the researchers (TB, DK, JE) reviewed the literature and extracted relevant standards from international guidelines for trauma [20], paediatrics [21, 22], surgery [23, 24] and anaesthesia [25]. We used an “expert group” process to revise these standards. The expert group was comprised of the six researchers plus ten anaesthesiologists and physicians currently working or with recent experience of working in low-income countries (see acknowledgements). The researchers conducted several face-to-face meetings and the expert group were consulted via email and telephone. Due to resource and time constraints we were unable to organise a formal Delphi method or a face-to-face meeting of the whole expert group. A final document of 104 indicators were decided upon that describe the minimal structural requirements for EaCC in low-income countries (available in the Additional file 2).

For the purposes of this study, 19 of the indicators were disregarded. This decision was taken by the researchers prior to data collection due to the risk that the many drug and equipment indicators (60 of the 104 indicators) would weigh the study too greatly towards the availability of these items. To assess whether the hospitals had extra resources beyond the minimum required for EaCC we selected a further ten indicators for “Advanced EaCC” from international best-practice guidelines [26]. Processes and outcomes of EaCC were not evaluated.

The indicators were divided into eight sections: infrastructure; human resources; training; drugs; equipment; routines; guidelines; support services. Where data was missing from four or more hospitals the indicator was excluded (apart from indicators in the routines and guidelines sections where missing data was judged likely to be due to an absence in the hospital). The hospitals were stratified into two groups: district/regional and referral/private as we hypothesised that resources would differ between the groups. We calculated the proportion of hospitals where each resource was available. We calculated a “resource availability score” for each hospital, subdivided into indicator sections, as percentages of available resources with missing data excluded. Due to the small sample size, inferential statistics were not used.

Ethical clearance was granted by the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/846) and permission for the study was granted by The Tanzanian Commission for Science and Technology (Costech) and district authorities in each study district. All interviewees gave informed consent to participate and were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time.

Results

Hospital characteristics

Of the ten hospitals included in the study, four were district hospitals (secondary care), three were regional hospitals (tertiary care), two were national referral hospitals (quaternary care) and one was a privately owned mission hospital (Table 2). The hospitals were located in four regions with a total population of 6.8 million (18% of the population of mainland Tanzania) [19]. All the hospitals divided patients up into specialty with separate admissions systems for adults and children. Obstetric patients were seen directly in the obstetric wards and were excluded from the analysis.
Table 2

Hospital characteristics

 

Hospitals

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Type

District

District

District

District

Regional

Regional

Regional

Referral

Private

Referral

Region

1

2

2

2

3

4

1

2

2

4

Number of beds

<200

200-400

200-400

200-400

>400

200-400

200-400

>400

<200

>400

Number of specialist doctors (excluding anaesthesiologists)

2

6

6

8

7

1

5

>50

18

25

Number of specialist anaesthesiologists

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

0

1

Number of non-specialist clinician anaesthetists

0

3

3

1

1

3

3

12

0

4

ICU

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Number of operating theatres

1

n/a

2

2

5

2

1

11

n/a

9

Number of beds divided into three groups: <200; 200-400; >400.

ICU Intensive Care Unit, locally defined by the hospitals.

n/a not available.

Quality of EaCC

Of the 104 indicators in the standards, 74 were used for the analysis. Nineteen equipment and drug indicators were disregarded to avoid weighting the study too greatly towards these items and eleven indicators were excluded due to missing data from four or more hospitals. The availability of each resource is shown in Table 3. A “Resource Availability Score” was calculated as the percentage of resources available in each hospital. The scores ranged from 57.1% to 92.1% with a median of 71.1% (Table 4). The referral/private hospitals had higher scores (median 89.7%) than district/regional hospitals (median 70.6%). Across all hospitals scores for infrastructure resources (50.0%) and for EaCC routines (42.2%) were lower than drugs (100%) and equipment (90.0%) (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6963-13-140/MediaObjects/12913_2012_Article_3771_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Emergency and critical care resource availability scores in ten hospitals in Tanzania.

Table 3

Percentage availability of resources for emergency and critical care

Resource

All hospitals

District/regional hospitals

Referral/private hospitals

   

n = 10

n = 7

n = 3

   

%

%

%

1

Infra-structure

Triage area for adults

30

0

100

2

 

Emergency/Resus Room or Area for adults

60

43

100

3

 

ICU or Area on a general ward for critically ill adults

50

29

100

4

 

Triage area for children

30*

43

100*

5

 

Emergency Room/Area for children

50

29

100

6

 

Paediatric ICU/area for critically ill children

90

86

100

7

Human Resources

Nurse always in the ER

100*

100*

100

8

 

Clinician always in the ER or on-call for ER

100*

100*

100

9

 

Designated Medical Head of ICU

-

-

100

10

 

There is a higher ratio of staff: patients on ICU than in any other ward

-

-

100

11

Training

Any staff trained in adult triage

20

29

0

12

 

Any staff formally trained in Emergency care of adults

40

29

67

13

 

Any staff formally trained in Critical Care for adults

20

0

67

14

 

Any staff trained in paediatric triage

40

43

33

15

 

Any staff formally trained in Emergency care of children

60

57

67

16

 

Any staff formally trained in Critical Care for children

80

71

100

17

Drugs

IV glucose

100*

100*

100

18

 

IV crystalloid

100*

100*

100

19

 

Diazepam

100*

100*

100

20

 

Paracetamol

100**

100**

100

21

 

IV penicillin

100

100

100

22

 

IV Gentamycin

100

100

100

23

 

IV Quinine

100**

100**

100

24

 

Adrenaline

100**

100**

100

25

 

Atropine

88*

83*

100

26

 

Salbutamol (for inhaler or nebuliser)

66*

50*

100

27

 

IV/IM opioid

100

100

100

28

 

Frusemide

100*

100*

100

29

 

Aminophylline

88*

83*

100

30

 

Insulin

70

57

100

31

 

Hydrocortisone

100

100

100

32

Equipment

Blood Pressure cuff

100

100

100

33

 

Stethoscope

100

100

100

34

 

IV cannulae

100

100

100

35

 

Bedside blood sugar strips/glucometer

70

71

67

36

 

Weighing scales

55*

57

50*

37

 

Suction

100*

100*

100

38

 

Gloves - clean

100

100

100

39

 

Thermometer

100*

100

100*

40

 

Urine Catheter

100

100

100

41

 

Oral Airway (Guedel)

60

43

100

42

 

Pulse oximeter

70

57

100

43

 

Naso-gastric Tubes

100

100

100

44

 

Oxygen concentrator/cylinder with face masks or nasal prongs and tubing

90

86

100

45

 

Electricity 24 hours/day

50

29

100

46

 

Running Water & soap

100

100

100

47

Routines

Formal system for categorising new adult patients according to urgency

40

14

100

48

 

Formal system for prioritising critically ill adults

44*

16*

100

49

 

Registration/Payment delayed until after triage & emergency treatment of critically ill adults

85***

80**

100*

50

 

Nurses do more frequent observations on critically ill adults

83****

66****

100

51

 

Ward rounds are done for critically ill adults at least twice a day

30

0

100

52

 

Formal system for categorising new paediatric patients according to urgency

57***

50*

100**

53

 

Formal system for prioritising critically ill children

-

50*

-

54

 

Registration/Payment delayed until after triage & emergency treatment of critically ill children

-

100****

-

55

 

Nurses do more frequent observations on critically ill children

77*

66*

100

56

 

Ward rounds are done for critically ill children at least twice a day

33*

0*

100

57

 

ICU admission criteria

-

-

50*

58

 

“Track and trigger” system on the wards for finding and referring critically ill patients to the ICU

-

-

0*

59

Guidelines

Triage Guidelines for adults

13**

0**

33

60

 

Guidelines for resuscitation/emergency care of adults

14***

0**

50*

61

 

Guidelines for managing seriously ill adults

20*****

0****

50*

62

 

Triage Guidelines for children

-

25***

-

63

 

Resuscitation Guidelines for children

-

25***

-

64

 

Guidelines for managing seriously ill children

-

33*

-

65

 

Guidelines for oxygen use

14***

25***

0

66

Support Services

Lab with facilities to measure Haemoglobin

100

100

100

67

 

Lab with facilities to measure Blood Glucose

100

100

100

68

 

Lab with facilities to measure Serum Urea/Creatinine, Sodium and Potassium

90

86

100

69

 

Chest X-ray facilities

100

100

100

70

 

System for emergency Blood Transfusion

100

100

100

71

 

System for making cross-matched blood available within one hour

80

86

67

72

 

System for testing donor blood for the viruses HIV, Hepatitis B & C

100***

100**

100*

73

 

Lab with facilities for microscopy & Bacterial Gram stain

100

100

100

74

 

Lab with facilities for bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivities

80

71

100

Data given as a percentage of the hospitals where each resource was available.

* missing data is shown with one asterix (*) per missing hospital. Where data is missing for all hospitals in a section a dash is shown (-).

ER Emergency Room; ICU Intensive Care Unit; IV Intravenous; IM Intramuscular.

Table 4

Emergency and critical care resource availability scores*, by section

 

All hospitals

District/regional hospitals

Referral/private hospitals

n = 10

n = 7

n = 3

 

Median

Range

Median

Median

All indicators

71.1

57.1-92.1

70.6

89.7

Infrastructure

50.0

16.7-100

50.0

100

Human Resources

-

-

-

100

Training

41.7

16.7-66.7

33.3

66,7

Drugs

100

71.4-100

86.7

100

Equipment

90.0

64.3-100

86.7

100

Routines

42.2

12.5-100

25.0

88.9

Guidelines

17.1

0-100

14.3

25

Support Services

100

75.0-100

100

100

* Resource availability scores calculated as a percentage of the resources available in each hospital. Averages calculated as the median score of the hospitals.

- missing data.

Infrastructure

In three hospitals there was a triage area for adults, and three hospitals had a triage area for children. Three hospitals had an emergency room (ER) for both children and adults. A further three had an ER for adults only and two hospitals had an ER for children only. Where an ER was not present the general outpatients department or the inpatient wards were used for emergency patients. Three hospitals had a ward that was designated as an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The level of critical care provided on the ICUs varied: from ventilators and electronic patient monitors to a simple increase in the nurse: patient ratio and more frequent patient observations. In the other hospitals critically ill patients were cared for on general wards; two hospitals had a specific ward area for critically ill adults and nine hospitals had designated beds for critically ill children. The referral/private hospitals had a greater availability of infrastructure resources (median 100%) than district/regional (median 50%). None of the district hospitals had a triage area, Emergency Room or an ICU.

Human resources

Specialist Anaesthesiologists (the specialty in Tanzania responsible for Critical Care) were present in only the two referral hospitals. In two hospitals the anaesthetic service was staffed solely by nurses. In the other hospitals non-physician clinicians were present alongside nurses. These included Clinical Officers (staff with three years of college training) and Assistant Medical Officers (Clinical Officers with two further years of clinical training). Anaesthetic staffing was low in comparison to other medical staff (Table 2).

Training

In none of the hospitals had all the staff involved in EaCC been trained in triage, emergency care or critical care. The indicators were therefore adjusted to show if hospitals had “any” staff instead of “all” staff trained. Twenty percent of hospitals had at least one staff trained in adult triage and 20% had at least one staff trained in adult critical care. Training was most prevalent in Paediatric critical care with 80% of hospitals with at least one trained staff. Three hospitals (30%) had at least one staff who had been trained in the World Health Organisation’s paediatric training in “Emergency Triage & Treatment” (ETAT) [21].

Drugs and equipment

Intravenous fluids, parenteral opioids, diazepam, and antibiotics were available in all the hospitals where data was accessible as were blood pressure cuffs, naso-gastric tubes, suction machines and gloves. Oxygen was available in nine of the ten hospitals. Oro-pharyngeal airways were only found in six hospitals and salbutamol for inhalation in six out of nine hospitals. Reliable electricity with a backup generator was present in 50% of the hospitals (one of the district hospitals, one of the regional and all of the referral and private hospitals). The district/regional hospitals had slightly less availability of drugs and equipment than the referral/private hospitals (medians 86.7%, 100% respectively).

Routines and written guidelines

Forty percent of hospitals had formal systems of triage for adults and 44% had systems for prioritising the management of critically ill adults. Similar rates were seen for children. Registration and payment was delayed until after triage and emergency treatment at all hospitals for children and all except one for adults. Once admitted, 83% of hospitals had routines for increasing the frequency of observations for critically ill adults. However, ward rounds by clinicians were carried out more than once daily in only 30% and 33% of hospitals for critically ill adults and children respectively. There were no written guidelines for adult triage, emergency treatment or critical care in any of the district or regional hospitals.

Support services

All hospitals had the facilities for checking haemoglobin, conducting bacterial gram stain, and performing chest x-rays. 80% of hospitals could perform bacterial cultures and sensitivities, 90% could measure serum electrolytes. All hospitals could give emergency blood transfusions, 80% could do this within one hour of receiving a blood group specimen.

Advanced EaCC

Mechanical ventilators were present in 40% of hospitals, arterial blood gas monitoring in 20% and central venous pressure monitoring in 1 hospital of 10 (data not shown). A median of 25.0% of all indicators were available across all hospitals, with 20% in district/regional hospitals and 80% in referral/private hospitals.

Discussion

We have shown that hospitals in Tanzania lack many structures necessary for Emergency and Critical Care (EaCC). Our study has found that the weakest parts of EaCC are an infrastructure that is not designed for managing critically ill patients, a lack of routines for the prioritisation and management of the critically ill and a low level of EaCC training among staff. In contrast, we have shown that hospitals are well stocked with drugs and equipment necessary for EaCC. Our study highlights the quality gap between the better resourced referral and private hospitals and the less resourced district and regional hospitals suggesting that while there is some capacity for EaCC in Tanzania, it hasn’t reached out to the smaller centres.

This study is, as far as we know, the first attempt to analyse the structural capacity for EaCC in a low-income country. As such its strengths are in highlighting this pressing need, to introduce standards for EaCC and to suggest likely causes of the reported weak performance and poor outcomes of EaCC in low-income countries [10, 27]. Similar insights can be seen from the Tanzanian Service Provision Assessment Survey 2006 [28] where only 19% of hospitals nationwide had the facilities to support 24-hour emergency services and from studies focusing on paediatric inpatient care [12, 29].

The sample size of ten hospitals is the study’s main weakness, limiting the generalisability to the whole country, and the single-country setting limits international generalisability. The experience of the authors is, however, that similar findings can be seen in many other hospitals in Tanzania. Recent studies in related disciplines have shown findings consistent with our results in the Gambia [30], Zambia [31], Mongolia [32] and in sub-Saharan Africa [33]. A further limitation is the lack of some data due to unavailability of information when the hospital visits were conducted. The processes and outcomes of EaCC were not observed in this study; the existence of certain equipment in a hospital does not mean it is in working order or in the correct place, used for the correct patients and at the correct time.

So why is the quality of EaCC so poor? It has not been prioritised politically or medically as it cuts across many disciplines, is not age or disease specific and there are very few Emergency or Intensive Care specialists. There is a belief that EaCC requires sophisticated or expensive equipment, although the basic EaCC that is the focus in this study such as adequate fluid resuscitation, intravenous dextrose for hypoglycaemia and oxygen for hypoxia are not expensive [34]. In our experience, fatalism among staff with low morale is common and self-fulfilling. Improving the service could lead to decreasing mortalities, which in turn could challenge fatalism. Vertical programs, while successfully tackling single diseases, have been less successful at strengthening health systems [35]. Programs for Essential Trauma Care [20], Emergency Obstetric Care [36], Hospital Care for Sick Children [22], Integrated Management for Adolescent and Adult Care [37] and Emergency and Essential Surgical Care [30, 38] have all been initiated by the WHO in the past few years. A common theme is the view that improving care for very sick patients is urgently required and would have the potential of reducing preventable mortality. A focus on EaCC could be a way of coordinating efforts in these programs.

There is a potential for improvement in EaCC. Recognising very sick patients quickly and instituting simple treatments has been the focus of much recent work in high-income countries with the introduction of Rapid Response Teams [39, 40]. The same principles apply in low-income settings: one study from Tanzania has shown that simple triage using vital signs can predict which patients have a high risk of mortality [41]. Reorganising a paediatric hospital admissions system in Malawi to include triage and emergency care reduced hospital mortality by 50% [42]. Intensive Care Units providing basic critical care are likely to be cost-effective due to a concentration of staff, skills and equipment close to the patients who need it most [43].

Improving levels of training is a vital issue in Tanzania and other low-income countries [44]. Critical Care is a subspecialty of Anaesthesia in Tanzania, and there are less than 20 specialist anaesthesiologists for a country of over 40 million people. Before 2009, when the first post-graduate training for doctors in Emergency Medicine was initiated, Tanzania had not trained any doctors in the speciality. Aside from the WHO’s paediatric ETAT program, there was little evidence of training courses in Tanzania in caring for emergency or critically ill patients. The almost complete lack of guidelines that we observed implies that standardised and evidenced based care is not being followed. Although guidelines alone have not always been seen to improve outcomes they may have the potential to improve quality of care if introduced through a multifaceted approach, targeting knowledge, motivation, resources, and the organisation of care [4547]. These patients do not have the luxury of waiting, and introducing training, routines and guidelines to improve the processes of care may lead to reduced mortality and morbidity.

A striking finding in the study is how well stocked the hospitals were with drugs and equipment necessary for basic EaCC. This suggests that a lack of the basic tools for EaCC cannot be blamed for deficiencies in the quality of care. Drugs and equipment for advanced care were mostly absent, but this should be seen rather as a rational prioritisation of resources than as a deficiency.

Conclusions

This study indicates to policy makers that improving the hospital systems for the care of emergency and critically ill patients in Tanzania should be prioritised. Improving the routines for managing these patients, increasing the human resources and training levels and improving the infrastructure may be the best ways to achieve this. Further research is required into the quality of the processes of EaCC and intervention studies are needed to assess the mortality and morbidity reductions and cost-effectiveness of improving EaCC.

Abbreviations

EaCC: 

Emergency and critical care

ER: 

Emergency room

ETAT: 

Emergency triage and treatment

ICU: 

Intensive care unit.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Isabeau Walker, Ray Towey, Iain Wilson, Martin Dunser, Mike Dobson, Elizabeth Molyneux, Stefan Jochberger, Maria Teresa Leiva, Bruce McCormick and Ulrika Baker for useful comments and additions to the Standards and Data Collection Tool. The study was funded by grants from the Laerdal Foundation, the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the Karolinska Institutet Travel Grant. The funding sources had no role in the design, conduct or reporting of the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska Institute
(2)
Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Surgical Services, Karolinska University Hospital
(3)
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
(4)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute

References

  1. Razzak JA, Kellermann AL: Emergency medical care in developing countries: is it worthwhile?. Bull World Health Organ. 2002, 80 (11): 900-905.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kobusingye OC, Hyder AA, Bishai D, Hicks ER, Mock C, Joshipura M: Emergency medical systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for action. Bull World Health Organ. 2005, 83 (8): 626-631.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunser MW, Baelani I, Ganbold L: A review and analysis of intensive care medicine in the least developed countries. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34 (4): 1234-1242. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000208360.70835.87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Adhikari NK, Rubenfeld GD: Worldwide demand for critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011, 17 (6): 620-625. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834cd39c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mock C, Kobusingye O, Joshipura M, Nguyen S, Arreola-Risa C: Strengthening trauma and critical care globally. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005, 11 (6): 568-575. 10.1097/01.ccx.0000186373.49320.65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng AC, West TE, Limmathurotsakul D, Peacock SJ: Strategies to reduce mortality from bacterial sepsis in adults in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2008, 5 (8): e175-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050175.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Requejo JH, Merialdi M, Bustreo F: Improving global maternal health: progress, challenges, and promise. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 23 (6): 465-470. 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834cdc9b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, Rudan I, Campbell H, Cibulskis R, Li M: Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012, 379 (9832): 2151-2161. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Molyneux E: Paediatric emergency care in developing countries. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9250): 86-87. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03536-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Amoateng-Adjepong Y: Caring for the critically ill in developing countries–our collective challenge. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34 (4): 1288-1289. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000208352.74208.75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. English M, Esamai F, Wasunna A, Were F, Ogutu B, Wamae A, Snow RW, Peshu N: Assessment of inpatient paediatric care in first referral level hospitals in 13 districts in Kenya. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9425): 1948-1953. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16408-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nolan T, Angos P, Cunha AJ, Muhe L, Qazi S, Simoes EA, Tamburlini G, Weber M, Pierce NF: Quality of hospital care for seriously ill children in less-developed countries. Lancet. 2001, 357 (9250): 106-110. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03542-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearson L, Shoo R: Availability and use of emergency obstetric services: Kenya, Rwanda, Southern Sudan, and Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005, 88 (2): 208-215. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baker T: Critical Care in Low Income Countries. Trop Med Int Health. 2009, 14 (2): 1-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Human Development Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/.
  16. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare: Emergency Obstetric Care Job Aid. 2005, Dar es Salaam: United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social WelfareGoogle Scholar
  17. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare: National Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. 2006, Dar es Salaam: United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social WelfareGoogle Scholar
  18. WHO: World Health Statistics. 2012, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  19. United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare: The United Republic of Tanzania: Annual health statistical abstract. Tanzania Mainland. 2008, Dar es Salaam: United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Health and Social WelfareGoogle Scholar
  20. WHO: Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care. 2004, Geneva: WHO PressGoogle Scholar
  21. WHO: Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT). 2005, Geneva: WHO PressGoogle Scholar
  22. WHO: Pocket Book of Hospital Care for Children. 2005, Geneva: WHOGoogle Scholar
  23. WHO: Surgical care at the district hospital. 2003, Geneva: WHO PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (GIEESC). http://www.who.int/surgery/globalinitiative/en/.
  25. Merry AF, Cooper JB, Soyannwo O, Wilson IH, Eichhorn JH: International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010. Can J Anaesth. 2010, 57 (11): 1027-1034. 10.1007/s12630-010-9381-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36 (1): 296-327. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gove S, Tamburlini G, Molyneux E, Whitesell P, Campbell H: Development and technical basis of simplified guidelines for emergency triage assessment and treatment in developing countries. WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Referral Care Project. Arch Dis Child. 1999, 81 (6): 473-477. 10.1136/adc.81.6.473.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey: Tanzania Service Provision Assessment Survey. 2006, Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  29. English M, Esamai F, Wasunna A, Were F, Ogutu B, Wamae A, Snow RW, Peshu N: Delivery of paediatric care at the first-referral level in Kenya. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9445): 1622-1629. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17318-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Iddriss A, Shivute N, Bickler S, Cole-Ceesay R, Jargo B, Abdullah F, Cherian M: Emergency, anaesthetic and essential surgical capacity in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ. 2011, 89 (8): 565-572. 10.2471/BLT.11.086892.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Jochberger S, Ismailova F, Lederer W, Mayr VD, Luckner G, Wenzel V, Ulmer H, Hasibeder WR, Dunser MW: Anesthesia and its allied disciplines in the developing world: a nationwide survey of the Republic of Zambia. Anesth Analg. 2008, 106 (3): 942-948. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318166ecb8. table of contentsView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bataar O, Lundeg G, Tsenddorj G, Jochberger S, Grander W, Baelani I, Wilson I, Baker T, Dunser MW: Nationwide survey on resource availability for implementing current sepsis guidelines in Mongolia. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88 (11): 839-846. 10.2471/BLT.10.077073.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Baelani I, Jochberger S, Laimer T, Otieno D, Kabutu J, Wilson I, Baker T, Dunser MW: Availability of critical care resources to treat patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Africa: a self-reported, continent-wide survey of anaesthesia providers. Crit Care. 2011, 15 (1): R10-10.1186/cc9410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Riviello ED, Letchford S, Achieng L, Newton MW: Critical care in resource-poor settings: lessons learned and future directions. Crit Care Med. 2011, 39 (4): 860-867. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206d6d5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. WHO: Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Edited by Don de Savigny and Taghreed Adam. 2009, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  36. WHO: Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. 2009, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  37. Crump JA, Gove S, Parry CM: Management of adolescents and adults with febrile illness in resource limited areas. BMJ. 2011, 343: d4847-10.1136/bmj.d4847.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Abdullah F, Troedsson H, Cherian M: The World Health Organization program for emergency surgical, obstetric, and anesthetic care: from Mongolia to the future. Arch Surg. 2011, 146 (5): 620-623. 10.1001/archsurg.2011.84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Konrad D, Jaderling G, Bell M, Granath F, Ekbom A, Martling CR: Reducing in-hospital cardiac arrests and hospital mortality by introducing a medical emergency team. Intensiv Care Med. 2010, 36 (1): 100-106. 10.1007/s00134-009-1634-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Chan PS, Jain R, Nallmothu BK, Berg RA, Sasson C: Rapid Response Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2010, 170 (1): 18-26. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rylance J, Baker T, Mushi E, Mashaga D: Use of an early warning score and ability to walk predicts mortality in medical patients admitted to hospitals in Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 103 (8): 790-794. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.05.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Molyneux E, Ahmad S, Robertson A: Improved triage and emergency care for children reduces inpatient mortality in a resource-constrained setting. Bull World Health Organ. 2006, 84 (4): 314-319.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Watters D, Wilson I, Leaver R, Bagshawe A: Care of the Critically Ill Patient in the Tropics. 2004, Oxford: Macmillan PublishersGoogle Scholar
  44. Cherian M, Choo S, Wilson I, Noel L, Sheikh M, Dayrit M, Groth S: Building and retaining the neglected anaesthesia health workforce: is it crucial for health systems strengthening through primary health care?. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88 (8): 637-639. 10.2471/BLT.09.072371.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Farmer AP, Legare F, Turcot L, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, McGowan JL, Wolf F: Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, 3: CD004398Google Scholar
  46. Ayieko P, Ntoburi S, Wagai J, Opondo C, Opiyo N, Migiro S, Wamae A, Mogoa W, Were F, Wasunna A: A multifaceted intervention to implement guidelines and improve admission paediatric care in Kenyan district hospitals: a cluster randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2011, 8 (4): e1001018-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001018.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Dunser MW, Festic E, Dondorp A, Kissoon N, Ganbat T, Kwizera A, Haniffa R, Baker T, Schultz MJ: Recommendations for sepsis management in resource-limited settings. Intensiv Care Med. 2012, 38 (4): 557-574. 10.1007/s00134-012-2468-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/13/140/prepub

Copyright

© Baker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.