Empirical evidence of the continuing improvement in cost efficiency of an endoscopic surveillance programme for gastric cancer in Singapore from 2004 to 2010
© Zhou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 March 2012
Accepted: 5 April 2013
Published: 15 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Guo|
|31 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuhiko Inoue|
|15 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Huijun Zhou|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|8 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Guo|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|5 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-139|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.