Implementation evaluation of the Dutch national heat plan among long-term care institutions in Amsterdam: a cross-sectional study
© Kunst and Britstra; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 15 May 2012
Accepted: 1 April 2013
Published: 11 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cees de Baat|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Bickler|
|14 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anton Kunst|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cees de Baat|
|5 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Bickler|
|5 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anton Kunst|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-135|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.