Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“One of those areas that people avoid” a qualitative study of implementation in miscarriage management

  • Blair G Darney1Email author,
  • Marcia R Weaver3, 2,
  • Deborah VanDerhei4,
  • Nancy G Stevens4 and
  • Sarah W Prager5, 2
BMC Health Services Research201313:123

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-123

Received: 9 July 2012

Accepted: 19 March 2013

Published: 3 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
9 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amelia Compagni
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniele Mascia
24 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Blair Darney
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-13-123

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Departments of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University
Department of Health Services, University of Washington
Global Health, University of Washington
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington
Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington