Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: ethnographic study using normalisation process theory
© Pope et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 November 2012
Accepted: 11 March 2013
Published: 23 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh|
|21 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mike Dent|
|15 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Pope|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Pope|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Georgiou|
|11 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-13-111|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.