How much can we gain from improved efficiency? An examination of performance of national HIV/AIDS programs and its determinants in low- and middle-income countries
© Zeng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 March 2011
Accepted: 24 March 2012
Published: 24 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lalit Dandona|
|7 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Johns|
|6 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Wu Zeng|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Johns|
|1 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Juhani Lehto|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Wu Zeng|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-74|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.