The National Adult Inpatient Survey conducted in the English National Health Service from 2002 to 2009: how have the data been used and what do we know as a result?
© DeCourcy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 August 2011
Accepted: 21 March 2012
Published: 21 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marloes Zuidgeest|
|9 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Campbell|
|19 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anna DeCourcy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marloes Zuidgeest|
|9 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Campbell|
|4 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Anna DeCourcy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|21 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-71|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.