A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks
© McInnes et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 July 2011
Accepted: 28 February 2012
Published: 28 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Wye|
|27 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marja Verhoef|
|20 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth McInnes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marja Verhoef|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-49|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.