Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Estonia
© Taba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 May 2012
Accepted: 29 November 2012
Published: 13 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annemie Heselmans|
|10 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marika Rosenthal|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|6 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annemie Heselmans|
|14 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Marika Rosenthal|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-455|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.