Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Estonia

  • Pille Taba1,
  • Marika Rosenthal1Email author,
  • Jarno Habicht2,
  • Helvi Tarien3,
  • Mari Mathiesen4,
  • Suzanne Hill5 and
  • Lisa Bero6
BMC Health Services Research201212:455

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-455

Received: 18 May 2012

Accepted: 29 November 2012

Published: 13 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
16 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annemie Heselmans
10 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Marika Rosenthal
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
6 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annemie Heselmans
14 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Marika Rosenthal
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
13 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-455

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Continuing Medical Education, University of Tartu
(2)
WHO Country Office in Republic of Moldova, World Health Organization
(3)
Infectious Diseases and Drug Abuse Prevention Department, National Institute for Health Development
(4)
Estonian Health Insurance Fund
(5)
Department of Essential Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policies, World Health Organization
(6)
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California

Advertisement