Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Developing the specifications of an Open Angle Glaucoma screening intervention in the United Kingdom: a Delphi approach

  • Susan E Campbell1Email author,
  • Augusto Azuara-Blanco2,
  • Marion K Campbell2,
  • Jillian J Francis2,
  • Alexandra C Greene3,
  • Craig R Ramsay2 and
  • Jennifer M Burr2
BMC Health Services Research201212:447

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-447

Received: 28 September 2011

Accepted: 31 July 2012

Published: 5 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Campbell
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sparrow
10 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Robin
4 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Campbell
Resubmission - Version 4
4 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Robin
21 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Campbell
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-447

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Nursing Sciences, Edith Cavell Building, University of East Anglia
(2)
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen
(3)
Child Health, University of Dundee, MACHS Building, Tayside Children’s Hospital, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School

Advertisement