Free choice of healthcare providers in the Netherlands is both a goal in itself and a precondition: modelling the policy assumptions underlying the promotion of patient choice through documentary analysis and interviews
© Victoor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 18 April 2012
Accepted: 5 October 2012
Published: 3 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aafke Victoor|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aafke Victoor|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|22 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannu Valtonen|
|24 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiaan Lako|
|20 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aafke Victoor|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|20 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiaan Lako|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hannu Valtonen|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|5 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-441|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.