Interprofessional communication with hospitalist and consultant physicians in general internal medicine: a qualitative study
© Gotlib Conn et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 December 2011
Accepted: 16 October 2012
Published: 30 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Lesley Gotlib Conn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Benjamin Chesluk|
|24 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Bainbridge|
|21 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Ching|
|20 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lesley Gotlib Conn|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lesley Bainbridge|
|13 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lesley Gotlib Conn|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|30 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-437|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.