Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Challenges in identifying barriers to adoption in a theory-based implementation study: lessons for future implementation studies

  • Andria Hanbury1Email author,
  • Katherine Farley1,
  • Carl Thompson1,
  • Paul Wilson2 and
  • Duncan Chambers2
BMC Health Services Research201212:422

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-422

Received: 6 March 2012

Accepted: 21 November 2012

Published: 23 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Mar 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andria Hanbury
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andria Hanbury
Resubmission - Version 4
31 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
7 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Menear
26 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andria Hanbury
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Menear
12 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
23 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-422

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Alcuin C, Department of Health Sciences, University of York
(2)
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York

Advertisement