Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“More bang for the buck”: exploring optimal approaches for guideline implementation through interviews with international developers

BMC Health Services Research201212:404

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-404

Received: 23 April 2012

Accepted: 15 November 2012

Published: 15 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg
11 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Van der Wees
28 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Anna Gagliardi
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Van der Wees
10 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-404

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Health Network

Advertisement