Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Independence, institutionalization, death and treatment costs 18 months after rehabilitation of older people in two different primary health care settings

  • Inger Johansen1Email author,
  • Morten Lindbak1,
  • Johan K Stanghelle2 and
  • Mette Brekke1
BMC Health Services Research201212:400

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-400

Received: 16 June 2012

Accepted: 12 November 2012

Published: 14 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Short
21 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frances Cunningham
22 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Inger Johansen
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-400

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of General Practice/General Practice Research Unit, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo
Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Oslo