Defining upper gastrointestinal bleeding from linked primary and secondary care data and the effect on occurrence and 28 day mortality
© Crooks et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 17 May 2012
Accepted: 7 November 2012
Published: 13 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma|
|3 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katia Verhamme|
|10 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Colin Crooks|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma|
|30 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katia Verhamme|
|17 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Colin Crooks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Preciosa Coloma|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-392|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.