Cost-effectiveness of new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Turkey: a decision analytical model
© Bakir et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 September 2011
Accepted: 22 October 2012
Published: 9 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Soarez|
|1 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edwin David McIntosh|
|11 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Javier Diez-Domingo|
|3 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mustafa Bakir|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edwin David McIntosh|
|23 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Javier Diez-Domingo|
|24 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Soarez|
|19 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mustafa Bakir|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-386|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.