Estimating length of stay in publicly-funded residential and nursing care homes: a retrospective analysis using linked administrative data sets
© Steventon and Roberts.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 2 July 2012
Accepted: 24 October 2012
Published: 31 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Netten|
|20 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Owen|
|11 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Adam Steventon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Netten|
|23 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Owen|
|22 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Adam Steventon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|31 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-377|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.