Building better systems of care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: findings from the Kanyini health systems assessment
© Peiris et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 29 November 2011
Accepted: 24 October 2012
Published: 28 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Dunt|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Gauld|
|6 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Wise|
|14 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Currow|
|25 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - David Peiris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Gauld|
|28 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Dunt|
|12 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - David Peiris|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-369|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.