Monitoring the prevalence of chronic conditions: which data should we use?
- Juan F Orueta1, 2Email author,
- Roberto Nuño-Solinis†2,
- Maider Mateos†2,
- Itziar Vergara†3, 4, 5,
- Gonzalo Grandes†6 and
- Santiago Esnaola†7
© Orueta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 21 December 2011
Accepted: 17 October 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marc Saez|
|15 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - R.A. Verheij|
|31 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Juan Fco Orueta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marc Saez|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - R.A. Verheij|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-365|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.