A qualitative study into the use of formal services for dementia by carers from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities
© Shanley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 October 2011
Accepted: 28 September 2012
Published: 9 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - liat ayalon|
|5 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Hall|
|12 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Adams|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - liat ayalon|
|23 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Adams|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - SY Kim|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-354|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.