Multistate models for comparing trends in hospitalizations among young adult survivors of colorectal cancer and matched controls
© Sutradhar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 October 2011
Accepted: 2 October 2012
Published: 9 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Blackford|
|17 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann|
|18 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Parsons|
|20 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rinku Sutradhar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Blackford|
|23 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Parsons|
|5 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Beyersmann|
|21 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Rinku Sutradhar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-353|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.