Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical decision support must be useful, functional is not enough: a qualitative study of computer-based clinical decision support in primary care

  • Tiina Kortteisto1Email author,
  • Jorma Komulainen2,
  • Marjukka Mäkelä3,
  • Ilkka Kunnamo4 and
  • Minna Kaila5
BMC Health Services Research201212:349

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-349

Received: 13 December 2011

Accepted: 5 October 2012

Published: 8 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Fiks
26 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sam Amirfar
28 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Khaled Abdel-Kader
12 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sheryl Davies
10 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Kortteisto
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Khaled Abdel-Kader
29 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Fiks
30 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Tiina Kortteisto
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-349

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere
(2)
The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim
(3)
Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment at National Institute for Health and Welfare
(4)
Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd
(5)
The Hjelt Institute, University of Helsinki

Advertisement