An assessment of the accuracy and availability of data in electronic patient tracking systems for patients receiving HIV treatment in central Mozambique
© Lambdin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 March 2011
Accepted: 2 February 2012
Published: 2 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Mar 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Barrot Lambdin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Lowrance|
|23 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dorothy Curtis|
|31 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Barrot Lambdin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dorothy Curtis|
|12 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Morales|
|7 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Barrot Lambdin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Morales|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.