Patient-centered, comparative effectiveness of esophageal cancer screening: protocol for a comparative effectiveness research study to inform guidelines for evidence-based approach to screening and surveillance endoscopy
- Jennifer R Kramer1, 2,
- Jennifer Arney1, 2, 4,
- John Chen1, 2,
- Peter Richardson1, 2,
- Zhigang Duan1, 2,
- Richard L StreetJr1, 3,
- Marilyn Hinojosa-Lindsey1, 2,
- Aanand D Naik†1, 2 and
- Hashem B El-Serag†1, 2Email author
© Kramer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 July 2012
Accepted: 15 August 2012
Published: 28 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hashem El-Serag|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-12-288|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.