Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cost-effectiveness of counselling, graded-exercise and usual care for chronic fatigue: evidence from a randomised trial in primary care

  • Ramon Sabes-Figuera1Email author,
  • Paul McCrone1,
  • Mike Hurley2,
  • Michael King3,
  • Ana Nora Donaldson4 and
  • Leone Ridsdale5
BMC Health Services Research201212:264

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-264

Received: 6 January 2012

Accepted: 6 August 2012

Published: 20 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Thomas
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hollingworth
25 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Hollingworth
24 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ramon Sabes-Figuera
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
6 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-12-264

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health (CEMPH), Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London
(2)
Academic Department of Physiotherapy, Health and Social Care Research Division, King’s College London
(3)
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Hampstead Campus, University College London
(4)
Dental Institute, King’s College London
(5)
Unit of Neurology and General Practice, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London

Advertisement